Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi There, wondering is someone can give me some advise!

I bought my ex council flat about 4 years ago, under leasehold terms and since then there have been quite a bit of work carried out on the building and I have dutifully paid for my share although some times stretching the money has proved to be a challenge!

Yesterday I received a 3rd Stage Consultation for Major work from the Housing office and I was shocked as the work they now intend to carry on on the building will cost me over ?10K! Now... This kind of money as many will appreciate is not something you have burning on your back pocket... Unfortunately I simply haven't got it... even breaking it down on a 3 years interest free will mean I have over 3K per year to fork out!

Can I refuse to pay on the basis I haven't got the funds or will I get into trouble?

Bare in mind that as it is I would have to find an extra job to cover this cost.... Undoubtly the council will pay for all of the flats in the building that have given as house benefit...

Thanks for any advise!

2nd time Mummy

I think you're obliged to pay it otherwise everyone in the block would be able to find a way out of paying.

It's probably a condition of the lease.

Ex council flats can explode the theory that external upkeep of a flat is cheaper than a house.

If you've a residents association they may be able to challenge the cost / selection of works.

2nd time mummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yesterday I received a 3rd Stage Consultation for

> Major work from the Housing office and I was

> shocked as the work they now intend to carry on on

> the building will cost me over ?10K!


Welcome to leasehold, and be grateful it's not a lot more. It will be next time.


Leasehold does have some advantages over freehold, in that you're not solely responsible for replacing roofs and other expensive stuff (the 'major works'), but the downside is that you're not solely in control of when, or how, the work gets done and, therefore, when you pay for it. Without that control, you just have to save a regular chunk of money for when it will be needed and hope it will be enough. Where the council is the freeholder, the costs have usually been higher as councils can't get away with the shoddy bodges the private sector indulges in. They used to be bound by "Decent Homes" standards, too, which were usually much higher than you'd find in the private sector, not least because a dripping tap in a council home is worth three or four pages in the Southwark News, whereas a collapsed ceiling in the private sector isn't worth mentioning.


If you're mortgaged, the lender can usually be persuaded to add any shortfall to the mortgage, at least if you've been good with the payments. And payments can usually be staged so they don't all hit at once. Depending on the schedule of the work, that's not always as helpful as it looks, but councils are usually fairly gentle, and most, including Southwark, have loan schemes that you can apply for.


As KidKruger points out, it will be in the lease, which you presumably agreed to. Not paying will be a breach of that lease, which will result in legal action against you. To start they'll get a court to demand you pay up, through the sale of the flat if need be, and then, if you don't comply with that, forfeit your lease (or, at least, have the lenders repossess it).


It is possible to challenge the need for major works or, at least, the details of the proposals or the cost of it (that's partly what the consultation process is for). But it's rarely successful unless they've been incompetently dodgy. ?10k isn't a particularly large amount for major works - some bills have been much higher - and it's possible the council are either drawing on a reserve fund made up from the left-overs from service charges, or have capped the contribution, though that all depends on what work is being done.


In other words, you can refuse to pay, but only if you've got somewhere else to live.

Hello,

I feel for you as this happened to us in May 2011 when the council demanded ?23k from us for Major Works.

All the works have been carried out now and the whole process was trying to say the least.

We formed a group of leaseholders and had endless meetings with local councillors involved and pieces in the press etc and checked all of the works carried out and only managed to get a couple of grand at most of the final bill.

The council will loan you the money at 0.5% above the base rate and I'll be paying that off for the next 20 odd years.

In short you will have agree to this when you signed your lease as previously mentioned and you are stuck with it, it took me ages to come to peace with it but I can only hope the works will incrase the value of the flat when I come to sell it.

Under the terms of your lease you are obliged to pay. When you bought your flat your solicitor should have obtained details of any major planned expenditure from the council, although sometimes this only projects 3 years into the future. It's worth checking what was supplied at the time you bought.


It's a bit late for you but I would always ask for a future maintenance plan if buying in a block as most components ie roof, windows etc have a finite life and external decorating is usually carried out on a cyclical basis. There should at least be an indicative plan of when these works are due with rough costs. This will at least give an idea of what you are facing.


It's always worth talking to the housing office but whatever your circumstances you will have to pay. If you don't pay the council can contact your mortgage lender and get the arrears added to your mortgage or apply to the court or the leasehold valuation tribunal.


The Leasehold Advisory Service is a useful site with practical help for leaseholders: http://www.lease-advice.org/


Good luck.

This happened to someone I knew on the Kingswood Estate - being elderly they did not have the money so agreed that Southwark could place a legal charge on the property which means that if the flat is sold, Southwark have to be repaid before money goes to seller.

Please join the Leaseholders Association of Southwark 2000 (aka 'LAS 200'.)

They are very knowledgable, run by volunteers but volunteers who know their stuff, and have successfully fought against Southwark on various excessive charges in years gone by, and will help you. They don't reply very quickly because as I said they are volunteers and many of them/us work, but maybe you may have skills you could offer too.


(ie ask not what your LAS2000...)


but please do consider joining, and they may be able to advise. However, everyone's posts above has been pretty good too!


LAS2000

P O Box 23394

LONDON

SE16 2WA


Write and ask for details of joining. I think it's ?30 a year or something.

You may be able to get quotes yourself for the works - In my experience councils massively overcharge for this kind of stuff. you may - I don't know, be able to set up what's called a RTM - it's a management company set up by the freeholders. you then organise works yourselves. It's a simple process that will save you thousands if you can do it. Call me and I'll talk you through it.


Matthew

07939530699

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...