Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mike Dean, sir you are a useless, arrogant,

> > attention seeking c**t

>

> We've all seen some fairly shoddy refereeing at

> times (and it's often him) but this was

> incredible. Has he been drug tested?


And during what was our best display so far at the new gaff.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely classic Liverpool. Win against a top 4

> rival, then lose against a bottom 3 team. If

> Chelsea win at Spurs they're 8 points clear. Can't

> see anyone overturning that unless they lose a

> couple of key players to injury or something.


Things can't be that bad if you class a draw as a defeat. This table shows how the Xmas fixtures have favoured Chelsea:


Hours that will be taken to play all three festive matches

Hours taken from the start of a team's first game to the end of their third game

1 Chelsea 223

2 Watford, Crystal Palace 201.5

3 Swansea 199

4 Arsenal, Bournemouth 198.75

5 Stoke 172.75

6 West Ham 172.5

7 Man Utd 172.25

8 Burnley, Everton, Sunderland, Tottenham, West Brom 170

9 Hull, Man City 167.75

10 Leicester, Middlesbrough 167.5

11 Liverpool 143.75

12 Southampton 117

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Despite the one-sided nature of the SPL, the Old

> Firm game is still a great game to watch...C'mon

> the Hoops!


I agree RD. It was a good one as it turned out. Winning after going behind, away from home, is always sweet. Great equalizer from Dembele. Rangers played well but Celtic had many more shots/corners etc so the gap was a possibly bigger than the scoreline suggests. I'd say Rangers dominated the first half hour, and Celtic the last hour.


A nice end to a year that got better and better for Celtic.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely classic Liverpool. Win against a top 4

> rival, then lose against a bottom 3 team. If

> Chelsea win at Spurs they're 8 points clear. Can't

> see anyone overturning that unless they lose a

> couple of key players to injury or something.


After tonight's fiasco I can honestly say I feel your pain Otta

Things are a little different since our last big name departure.


The following have all signed new long term deals in the last few months:


Pochettino

Lloris

Kane

Alli

Eriksen

Dier

Vertonghen

Rose

Walker

Carroll

Winks

Vorm



And by all accounts a new Alderweireld deal is close.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That doesn't mean they won't leave though, just

> that Spurs will get more money if one was sold,

> and the player in the meantime gets a salary

> increase. Everybody's happy...until a bigger club

> comes calling.


It was more intended to illustrate the feeling at the club at the moment.


Players love being there and love Pochettino and what he's building. All have made very positive and encouraging noises about the future. Less need to chase money and glory elsewhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...