Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mike Dean, sir you are a useless, arrogant,

> > attention seeking c**t

>

> We've all seen some fairly shoddy refereeing at

> times (and it's often him) but this was

> incredible. Has he been drug tested?


And during what was our best display so far at the new gaff.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely classic Liverpool. Win against a top 4

> rival, then lose against a bottom 3 team. If

> Chelsea win at Spurs they're 8 points clear. Can't

> see anyone overturning that unless they lose a

> couple of key players to injury or something.


Things can't be that bad if you class a draw as a defeat. This table shows how the Xmas fixtures have favoured Chelsea:


Hours that will be taken to play all three festive matches

Hours taken from the start of a team's first game to the end of their third game

1 Chelsea 223

2 Watford, Crystal Palace 201.5

3 Swansea 199

4 Arsenal, Bournemouth 198.75

5 Stoke 172.75

6 West Ham 172.5

7 Man Utd 172.25

8 Burnley, Everton, Sunderland, Tottenham, West Brom 170

9 Hull, Man City 167.75

10 Leicester, Middlesbrough 167.5

11 Liverpool 143.75

12 Southampton 117

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Despite the one-sided nature of the SPL, the Old

> Firm game is still a great game to watch...C'mon

> the Hoops!


I agree RD. It was a good one as it turned out. Winning after going behind, away from home, is always sweet. Great equalizer from Dembele. Rangers played well but Celtic had many more shots/corners etc so the gap was a possibly bigger than the scoreline suggests. I'd say Rangers dominated the first half hour, and Celtic the last hour.


A nice end to a year that got better and better for Celtic.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely classic Liverpool. Win against a top 4

> rival, then lose against a bottom 3 team. If

> Chelsea win at Spurs they're 8 points clear. Can't

> see anyone overturning that unless they lose a

> couple of key players to injury or something.


After tonight's fiasco I can honestly say I feel your pain Otta

Things are a little different since our last big name departure.


The following have all signed new long term deals in the last few months:


Pochettino

Lloris

Kane

Alli

Eriksen

Dier

Vertonghen

Rose

Walker

Carroll

Winks

Vorm



And by all accounts a new Alderweireld deal is close.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That doesn't mean they won't leave though, just

> that Spurs will get more money if one was sold,

> and the player in the meantime gets a salary

> increase. Everybody's happy...until a bigger club

> comes calling.


It was more intended to illustrate the feeling at the club at the moment.


Players love being there and love Pochettino and what he's building. All have made very positive and encouraging noises about the future. Less need to chase money and glory elsewhere.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
    • Dog kennel isn't a great name for a school. I agree that it's ridiculous for the name to put anyone off going there, but don't see any issue with them rebranding if the parents and children prefer a new name. The school is surrounded by historical 'groves' (reflected in the names of Camberwell Grove, Grove park and Grove Vale for example), so it's not a totally random name. 
    • It might help if there are body cams to record evidence and a presence maybe a deterrent but I very much doubt a park warden would intervene with obnoxious and violent thugs - children or not. We need police for that.  
    • I had a leaky toilet cistern and Niko came out the same day and not only fixed the leak but thoroughly cleaned off the years of calcium build-up. His attention to detail was matched by his kind humanity. The result was a completely renovated toilet which has never worked more efficiently as well as 'service with a smile'. MANY THANKS NIKO!!!  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...