Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bhoy in Singapore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shame there wont be any more "Old Firm' matches

> now that Rangers have died.

> Celtic v Partick Thistle - the new improved

> Glasgow derby!


Ah, that old chestnut. So are Celtic a new club since 1994 or when ever it was the club was transferred to a new entity? When McCann saved you?

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was bringing the piblet, but been trumped by a

> mate sprogging so bit miffed I won't be there.

> Take Otta, he's been meaning to go for ages, and

> check this out for the liquidity of the footie on

> offer.

> http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/dulwichhamlet/videos

> /dulwich-hamlet-4-v-2-lewes-goal-by-kevin-james-on

> -5102013-45088.html


That's a bloody good goal. Time I went. Not been there in decades.

Ah the two pet Celtc monkeys slapping each other's backs!

Have a read of these if you want to be educated as to how Rangers are still the same club even though in your wildest wet dreams you won't want it to be true.

If you want any of it read s...l...o...w...l...y so you can understand it, let me know!


Lord Nimmo Smith/Glennie/SPL:

http://tiny.cc/ojiipw - NimmoSmith verdict's proving Rangers FC continues (JPG)

http://tiny.cc/832kqw - Lord Nimmo Smith's report (PDF)

http://tiny.cc/xn6kqw - SPL CEO Neil Doncaster: "It is an existing club, even though it's a new company" 1 minute in.

http://tiny.cc/0ko6xw - Lord Glennie - distinguishing between company and club


UEFA:

http://tiny.cc/u8akpw - UEFA Rangers "Scottish Cup" squad (Elgin game) updated 8th Dec 2012 (LINK)

http://tiny.cc/r12kqw - UEFA's updated Scottish Cup squad (JPG)


SFL/SPFL:

http://tiny.cc/8h832w - SPFL Rangers home page - "Founded 1872" - Full trophy list (LINK)

http://tiny.cc/pyyzyw - Derek Longmuir, SFL CEO, congratulating Gers on 140 years.


SFA:

http://tiny.cc/xn832w - SFA statement - Newco are "the new owners of the Rangers Football Club"

http://tiny.cc/b1kuyw - SFA Annual Review - RFC "entering liquidation and subsequently accommodated into SFL3"

http://tiny.cc/qdfjqw - SFA's Scottish Cup archive: Rangers FC record continuous into 2013. (JPG)

http://tiny.cc/gt3kqw - SFA Q&A: clarifying status of "Rangers FC" re. Div 3, 4 yrs of accounts, Scottish Cup entry (LINK)

http://tiny.cc/lu3kqw - SFA statement "full membership has been transferred". (LINK)


HMRC:

http://tiny.cc/cryzyw - "the liquidation route does not prejudice the proposed sale of the club. This sale [of Rangers FC] can take place either through a CVA or a liquidation." (LINK)


European Clubs Association:

http://tiny.cc/yw5kqw - "The organisation considers the club?s history to be continuous regardless of the change of company" (LINK)


Advertising Standards Authority:

http://tiny.cc/gs832w - Rangers' most successful club claim is rubber-stamped by the ASA


BBC - Independent report by Editorial Standards Committee:

http://tiny.cc/lezzyw - "where.. the BBC had made the distinction between an ?old? and ?new? Rangers.. club as opposed to the ?old? and ?new? company, ..due accuracy had not been achieved."


Malcolm Cohen - BDO Liquidator:

http://tiny.cc/z0u72w - "appointment of liquidators... only the end of the company that ran the club."


Neil Patey - Partner at Ernst and Young:

http://tiny.cc/x8u72w - "a newco in legal terms, but the club is a continution".

http://tiny.cc/0cv72w - Q & A with BBC, many quotes such as Green "bought the club", new owners etc.


AND FINALLY, this one will really have you spitting feathers!!!


Dermot Desmond:

http://tiny.cc/vqo6xw - "A fantastic club with great history"

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So Rangers bought all their trophies and went

> bust. Is that the gist of it?



Put the rod away!

Not much else going on El Pibe and assumed on a football focus thread the chat could be anything related to football. Apologies if I've got that wrong.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At the risk of alienating the only people keeping

> this thread going at the moment, but can we give

> the tedious old firm nonsense a rest for a bit,

> there are entire fora dedicated to that sort of

> thing.

>

> Where we, miwaw, @#$%&!



I was going to post the same yesterday, I'd rather there be no thread than keep reading this pathetic shite from two blokes that aren't from Glasgow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...