Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blimey, and I thought Spurs fans had some of the

> biggest moaners amongst their fan base but you

> Irons have surpassed yourselves. Mind you, if

> Spurs lose to Fool'em tonight I'll be incandescent

> with rage.


Moaners? Yep, it's our ?55 a pop right. Realists? Absolutely. To see a neanderthal occupying an area with " The Academy of Football" is an utter insult.


Regardless of That nonsense I don't honestly believe The Premiership is the be-all and end-all of football.


Those that do forget what football is about.

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Moaners? Yep, it's our ?55 a pop right. Realists?

> Absolutely. To see a neanderthal occupying an area

> with " The Academy of Football" is an utter

> insult.

>

> Regardless of That nonsense I don't honestly

> believe The Premiership is the be-all and end-all

> of football.

>

> Those that do forget what football is about.


All too true.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> there's a gag there somewhere about never giving a

> succour an even break but my sense of humour

> vacuum persists - over to you RD


Oh well, if you can't beat them...


MOYES YOU FOOKING GOLLUM HEADED WASTE OF SPACE!!!

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> streams for tonights games

> http://shadygiz.blogspot.co.uk/



I tried to get on one of those links for last nights Spurs game and all I got was a load of fecking bugs. I've just spent most of this morning getting all the bugs out of my computer so thanks for that. I'll not be clicking on any of your streams again.

Do you have an antivirus like AVG or something like that?


If not, download windows security essentials

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-GB/windows/security-essentials-download


"Which?" did a thing on anti virus software a year or so ago, and at that time, windows security essentials rated pretty much as high as the paid for ones. Annoyingly I have to pay for one in order to access my very fussy remote access to work. Otherwise I'd be more than happy with a free one.


Aaaaaanyway, back to footy.

This is the sort of over zealous reaction from clubs that does my head in. Similar to the crap we get from the stewards at the Arsenal for standing. Do prem clubs want their fans to be devoid of any passion or emotion for their clubs? And as for local councils, don't get me started. FFS


Meanwhile Spurs have banned a section of their own young fans known as the '1882' group from Block J at White Hart Lane after they moved on to the stairs and did not comply with various instructions and warnings, resulting in the club receiving a warning from their local council. The club plans to re-site the fans behind the goal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...