Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They haven't been close enough to choke in the PL to be honest. But there will be pressure if the title comes close. City found it hard to get over the line as does any club that has not won it for a while, eg Arsenal 1989 threw away a big lead before ultimately winning.

> Oh and a fun anacdote now I will no longer be

> suprised by the ManU score as I was trying to

> watch it 'live' on MOTD, at WHL the only cheer on

> Boxing Day from the Spuds was when it was

> announced that WHU had gone one-nil up. Funnily

> enough they didn't announce 1-1, 1-2, 1-3. All

> credit to the Bluebird fans today for the noise

> they made BTW.


I concur. I was there. To be fair I think it is always a bit quiet on Boxing Day. Too many Xmas hangovers. Certainly the quietest I can ever recall at WHL.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last 3, 4 arsenal games have been dreadful. Truly

> stank the place out. But it's a mid season dip

> and we are squeezing results out. A few more and I

> expect us to get our groove back and push on

>

> That, or we will choke as per


Its known as winning ugly, something Yanited and the Chavs have been doing for a while and are lauded for having grit and character. So when Arsenal do it the media say we were fortunate. Fcuk off, its what wins titles, you can't always play beautiful football and IF we win the title, I'll be more than happy. By the way I see that Yanited now has the two players who share the dubious title of being most yellow carded players for diving in the Prem. Character eh?

When was the last time a season was this close at this stage?


Liverpool top at christmas, lose 2 games, and down to 5th, get a win and back in top 4.


One loss at the moment can make a huge difference. Going to be an interesting second half of the season whatever happens. I reckon Spurs may still have something to say about the top 4 (although hopefully not at Liverpool's expense!). Chelsea are quietly winning games, would love to see them have a bad patch!

Couldn't agree more re Chelsea Otta. The shame of it though is that, until yesterday, I think they were having a bad patch. Referees carried them through their games at the Emirates and against Liverpool. They took 4 points from those two games when I don't think they deserved more than 1, if any at all.


The league is wonderfully close this year. Remains to be seen whether Arsenal will choke, however, over the last few seasons we've actually improved in the second half...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD. Januzaj has five bookings this season. All for

> diving. As for that other @#$%& Young, the less

> said the better.


Indeed Jah, shame the likes of Talkshite, Sky and the rest of the media are slow to pick up on, let alone mention it eh?

The experts on MOTD concluded that Young should have had a pen and Januzaj was fouled. This topic does not lend itself to balanced views being expressed. Particularly from the unholy North London alliance.


http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/whats-going-adnan-januzaj-dive-6462463


Edited to add some facts.

Your opinion is certainly biased Jah. You forgot to mention that a certain former Spurs player who now plys his trade in Madrid, tops the list of all-time yellows for simulation, and Spurs top the table for clubs. We're 3rd behind Chelsea with Arsenal just behind.

And as for this unholy North London alliance. Well it's a bit like kissing cousins, it's not illegal but it's just wrong...

Gareth Bale was apparently booked seven times for diving. Hence we're top of the list. Not our player anymore though. Most of those weren't dives in my opinion, just a case of trying to get out of the way of someone trying to take him out but there were also a few that even I thought were blatant and down right embarrassing.

As an aside though I thought Moyes was most ungracious in defeat complaining about refereeing decisions which let's face it at Old Trafford usually go Man Utd's way. Spurs have been on the end of some awful decisions up there in last ten years or so which have cost us dearly. Them's the breaks. Some you win and some you lose. Mostly though down the years there has been far more decisions go your way than anywhere else in the country. I'd like to know how many penalties have been given to the away side up there in the last decade. One? Maybe two at a pinch. You don't have Fergie putting the fear of God into the refs anymore. Better get used to it.


As for an unholy north London alliance. You're having a giraffe. Just watch the game tomorrow.

Only one or two pens given to away sides in a decade? Get real! :)

Someone once did a survey on this conspiracy theory, and the results poo poo'd it.

This perceived bias is more to do wth the fact that away teams didn't attack much at OT, hence penalty chances were few and far between. On the flip side, Utd got more penalties because we were camped in opposing teams penalty boxes.

It's quite logical when you open your eyes...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only one or two pens given to away sides in a

> decade? Get real! :)

> Someone once did a survey on this conspiracy

> theory, and the results poo poo'd it.

> This perceived bias is more to do wth the fact

> that away teams didn't attack much at OT, hence

> penalty chances were few and far between. On the

> flip side, Utd got more penalties because we were

> camped in opposing teams penalty boxes.

> It's quite logical when you open your eyes...


Camped in opposition half, you're almost as deluded as David Moist.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

On the

> flip side, Utd got more penalties because we were

> camped in opposing teams penalty boxes.

> It's quite logical when you open your eyes...


That'll explain your lofty position in the Prem................pahahahahahahaha

That Stretford Enders article is laughable - the comments do a half decent job of highlighting its many flaws.


This is a decent article on the subject:


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/9379989.stm


Not about United specifically, but you can see the penalty data there plain and simple. And especially Webb's record at OT. Quite striking the difference in Webb's performance the other day now that SAF has gone, which is undoubtedly the difference. Everyone is aware of SAF's influence over referees and journalists and, now that he's gone, the difference is manifest.


For what it's worth I thought Janujaz was fouled and the Young one could have been given as a pen. Can only think that in both cases the players' correctly earned reputations contributed to nothing being given.


Welbeck dfinitely dived, minimal contact or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...