Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Beyond caring. Cardiff is Last Chance

> Saloon...with two chances slim and none. I

> actually don't care.


I have to say I thought he'd be gone. It looks like Sullivan/Gold are spineless (irrespective of cost to get rid of him).

BBC Website


"West Ham manager Sam Allardyce retains the backing of the club's owners despite the humiliating League Cup semi-final defeat by Manchester City.


BBC Sport has learned that David Gold and David Sullivan were not swayed by the result at the Etihad, despite large sections of the travelling support appearing to turn on the manager.


West Ham continue to work hard in the transfer market and are hopeful of adding two or three new players in the coming days.


The first arrival could yet be Monaco striker Lacina Traore, who could arrive on loan if he is granted a work permit at a hearing next Monday."



It's strange, I generally want clubs to give managers time, and stick with them rather than sacking them after a few bad results, but in this case, he just looks so out of touch with reality.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's strange, I generally want clubs to give

> managers time, and stick with them rather than

> sacking them after a few bad results, but in this

> case, he just looks so out of touch with reality.


Part of the reality is that WHU have suffered big time with injuries, in particular the centre half dept (I can think of 3) IMO it's the most important position on the park, even City have struggled when Kompany has been out. Maybe the Board think these are mitigating circumstances to at least wait until some of the injured players come back and see if that makes a difference...

You're right RD but the problems started a long long time before the injuries - right about when Downing was signed and no striker was.


I feel too that Cardiff is last chance but worry that - by law of averages or Cardiff having a bad day - a win will prolong the agony - and yet I want a win - and yet that'll keep him at the club - but I want a win - it's a footy catch 22.


I accept a new man may not keep us up but at least the rebuild could start earlier.



'bout now's earlier post sums it up for me.


'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know what to say and quite frankly I'm at

> the point of not caring. The whole situation at

> WHUFC makes me feel unclean, from the odious porn

> twats to the most unimaginative, egotistical prick

> ever to visit Upton Park.

>

> I want my brilliant, comical, wonderful club back.

Tommy1000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed, can't believe Pardew's not there!


Really? Pardew's record is only 3 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, even Moyes' record is slightly better with 4 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses.

Semantics really, as Pellegrini should get it with 6 wins and a draw. I'd give special mention to Pullis, 3 wins out of 6 for the then bottom club is good going...

Is this real or a spoof?


http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/sam-allardyce-were-all-hurting-as-much-as-the-west-ham-fans-9050950.html


"But I?m not built like that. I may be a modern man in terms of utilising technology and the latest techniques but I have traditional values when it comes to life."


It's giving me a chuckle in any case

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tommy1000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Indeed, can't believe Pardew's not there!

>

> Really? Pardew's record is only 3 wins, 1 draw and

> 2 losses, even Moyes' record is slightly better

> with 4 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses.

> Semantics really, as Pellegrini should get it with

> 6 wins and a draw. I'd give special mention to

> Pullis, 3 wins out of 6 for the then bottom club

> is good going...


Sorry, I was being sarcastic!


Agree with the other suggestions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I didn't say wedge it "slightly" open. I meant to wedge it fully open. 
    • I have a rescue Spanish greyhound (galgo) from the charity mentioned above. You can contact Greyhounds in Need or one of the more local Kent greyhound rescue charities. They are fantastic family dogs. They do love walkies 2 or 3 times a day but they actually don't need to be walked too far and then they will happily loaf around on the sofa being very chill. They are brilliant with kids but not recommended if you own a cat as they have a strong prey drive. They also should be kept on the lead in local parks. They prefer to be around other sight-hounds (well my one does) and there are loads of local sighthound owners in Peckham, Crystal Palace etc and a very lively WhatsApp group that is brilliant if you need dog sitting as you can usually find someone to do that for free in return for you looking after the dog at a later date etc.
    • @Jenijenjen I assure you we are always polite and friendly too! Which is why the behaviour we have been receiving is so frustrating. The kids always leave her with a “Thank you have a lovely day”  Our concern is leaving the gate slightly wedged doesn’t stop the action of slamming it open and closed…still leading to damage  
    • If you're talking about who I think you are, I find them more exuberant than rude and usually smiling and polite. But then, I'm usually smiling and polite to them. Can you not wedge open your gate when you're expecting them?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...