Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He then went on to much bigger and better

> things.

>

> He was also one of the first players to walk away

> from a club for nothing, by virtue of being out of

> contract.



Going to some shabby outfit called AS Monaco, I bet he was gutted.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Team were boo-ed off when 1-0 up at half-time and

> boo-ed off at the end. A game of thumpball again

> with no imagination just lump it upfield - and it

> still took a penalty (dubious) and a freak

> own-goal to win.

>

> I think it's good to see BFS's boast that 'they'll

> change their tune when we win a couple of games'

> and the feeling behind it (that all fans care

> about is winning at any cost) is shattered.

>

> Neither he, nor a lot of the players, pundits,

> commentators - in fact anyone who earns a living

> through football and makes money out of it (rather

> than puts their own money IN) - can grasp the fact

> that some fans want a bit more for their

> hard-earned and from the club they love.

>

> Ultimately for Gold & Sullivan the fans are the

> customers and they aint happy and they won't keep

> paying for what they don't want - and G&S are

> businessmen. Which is a roundabout way of saying

> you may be right - and I hope to @#$%& you are.



Just read about and seen the photo of BFS cupping his ear to the fans.

He's toast. Now don't go and ruin it all by appointing Malky Mackay...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


Misguided. Supporters should support the team during the game and if they want to show any disapproval, do it after the final whistle. Even then, they should at least wait until we're out of the CL and the season is over...

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to be

> flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800 by

> fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.


It can't end well for anyone involved.


It's spectacularly embarrassing.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What about the "Moyes Out" banner allegedly to

> be

> > flown over OT ? Red Issue has gained over ?800

> by

> > fans to get this done, apparently. Bit sad.

>

> It can't end well for anyone involved.

>

> It's spectacularly embarrassing.


Greater Manchester Police have just announced that a 'no-fly zone' has been put in place over Old Trafford. Chief Spokesman Robin Banks advised that the police have still not accounted for the whereabouts of a football last seen leaving the stadium during a match versus Sunderland in the Capital One Cup, and therefore can not guarantee the safety of any low flying aircraft.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >..... Now don't go and ruin it all by

> > appointing Malky Mackay...

>

>

> There are (barely audible as yet) Michael Laudrup

> whispers...



... apparently some chap called Moyes might also be in the running?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10727626/Sam-Allardyces-future-at-West-Ham-is-under-threat-even-if-he-saves-club-from-relegation-this-season.html

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bhoy in Singapore Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > 45 - 0 nuff said

>

>

> Think you might need to say something more BiS...


Think it's 45 titles to us and 0 to the newly formed club next door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I may be a scrooge but to pay over £100 plus for a meal is a bit much. I understand that staff costs would be a high factor in this price and that being no transport on Christmas Day - pubs may have to pay car hire fees. The café in Christ Church will be doing a 3 course meal in the run up to Christmas for around £30 per head (Booking essential) so to charge an additional £60 plus seems somewhat unreasonable. The past few years, there have only been the 2 of us on Christmas Day, so we lash out and buy a lot of M & S food - ready prepared or with minimal cooking at a cost of between £30 and £40. We host the family Boxing Day onwards (8 - 10 people) spending around £60 on food and drink. Rather spend £100 for food etc over a couple of days rather than £200 for one meal. We are fortunate that we have the finances  to do this as many people are not able to do this. One family member with young children would find it hard to spend even £10 on a Christmas meal. Our kids come armed with plastic boxes to all family meals to take home any leftovers - so we are left with minimal waste- any veg and meat  get made into soup.
    • That would be Dulwich Wood ward wouldn’t it? One of the wards Southwark added Nov ‘23. Maybe the estate against didn’t get the memo. Oh man what a shit show. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...