Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just looked at a couple of "as it happened" reports, both of which say that the silence was well respected at the time. However, one of them later mentions reports that there was some faint singing, possibly by fans not yet out on the stands.


I dunno. The vast majority of Chelsea fans are just footy fans like any other, but they do seem to have a small number of comlete and utter cunts supporting them. And one captaining them.

Liverpool's performance on Sunday.....


Thought overall impressive but when it went to 2-2 I thought there was only going to be one winner and thought a number of Liverpool players went missing, especially Suarez who thought at 2-2 that the only way to win an important game was by fooling the referee into penalties/free kicks he didn't deserve, and clearly lost his composure by being regularly caught offside. The winner was a bit of an opportunistic effort, brilliantly taken.


Liverpool of course won't mind one bit how they got the points, any win against MC is fantastic, but they do seem to freeze a bit when teams come back at them.


My worry is that, assuming they beat Norwich??, that against Chelsea, they wont be able to establish that early lead, Chelsea being what they are.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Liverpool's performance on Sunday.....

>

> Thought overall impressive but when it went to 2-2

> I thought there was only going to be one winner

> and thought a number of Liverpool players went

> missing, especially Suarez who thought at 2-2 that

> the only way to win an important game was by

> fooling the referee into penalties/free kicks he

> didn't deserve, and clearly lost his composure by

> being regularly caught offside. The winner was a

> bit of an opportunistic effort, brilliantly

> taken.

>

> Liverpool of course won't mind one bit how they

> got the points, any win against MC is fantastic,

> but they do seem to freeze a bit when teams come

> back at them.

>

> My worry is that, assuming they beat Norwich??,

> that against Chelsea, they wont be able to

> establish that early lead, Chelsea being what they

> are.



Considering that Liverpool have won ten PL games in a row and that Chelsea's away form is patchy- i think Liverpool are strong favourites for that game and for the League title now. Plus Chelsea have the small matter of a two legs of a CL semifinal either side of the game.

That could well be the key. I hope Chelsea do quite well in the first leg, not so well that they feel it's won, but well enough that they're still in it, and maybe have that in their minds when they come to Anfied.


I then obviously hope they lose to Liverpool before getting buried in the second CL leg.


Neither Sturridge nor Suarez were great on Sunday, which for me shows what a good team performance it was.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> I then obviously hope they lose to Liverpool

> before getting buried in the second CL leg.


That the ideal scenario


>

> Neither Sturridge nor Suarez were great on Sunday,

> which for me shows what a good team performance it

> was.


That's a glass half full approach.

And why not? Whatever will be will be now, not point being negative.


Agree with RD though, think Chelsea will be a harder proposition for Liverpool. City was always going to be a very difficult match which we could have lost, but it was always going to be like to boxers going toe to toe and throwing bombs. Chelsea will be much cagier and try to knock us out with counter punches.


As I say, whatever will be will be, but I pray we beat them, just to wipe the smug look off of Jose's face.

"but I pray we beat them, just to wipe the smug look off of Jose's face."


ah I remember last time I feltthat way


1000 games in charge for Wenger - surely THIS was the moment to ... awwww bugger


but I am so hoping Liverpool do it - and am booking time in the pub for that game. Everywhere will be heaving I expect

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...