Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

Anyway, now that the season is over, how do we fell overall? (apologies for Premiership focus)


I thought it was a cracker. I have obvious disappointments, and yesterday was possibly slightly anti-climatic but there was PLENTY to get your teeth into this season


Tight race between several teams at the top

Congested bottom half where so many teams got sucked in

mini-miracle revivals at Sunderland and Palace

sense of change in the Natural Order of Things

That Wilshire goal


etc etc

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

aye, well done city. on a more mundane note, sam can go on about safety and 13th, but we've been relegated on more than 40 points before, with better teams playing better football.

A horrible year. Distubed by reports in the press saying he's safe in his job.


On a happier note Cole retires from international football.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Man City fully deserved it. Scored the most goals and played some fantastic football along the way. Does Mick Mac watch a different game to the rest of us? Hurling perhaps?


A very disappointing season at Spurs. Played dead boring football under AVB. Not impressed with Sherwood. Took some hidings off the big teams and beaten three times by the Hammers. Wasted money on seven players who'd never played in the Premiership before. The chairman and DOF have a lot to answer for. We need stability at the club. I'm now of the opinion that Harry should never have been sacked despite him taking his eye off the ball when the England job came up.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Not keen to see the most expensively constructed team winning on this occasion. Good as they are I feel its a shame.


I think a Liverpool win would have been a success for coaching and a coach who achieved the sum of the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. A team for less than 100m winning the league would have been good to see. Call me an old romantic, but I'd like to have seen that and Mourinho's tactics against Liverpool were just destructive, I don't like to see that winning through either. Rodgers showed some weaknesses too of course.


Man City are a possession team with the best players.


Liverpool was very much, we will score more than you. Great fun and the best season for a while, for me.


What will be interesting is whether Liverpool now spend as the others have done. They will probably need to as they significantly overperformed their resources this year.

titch juicy

titch juicy

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not keen to see the most expensively constructed

> team winning on this occasion. Good as they are I

> feel its a shame.

>

> I think a Liverpool win would have been a success

> for coaching and a coach who achieved the sum of

> the whole being greater than the sum of the parts.

> A team for less than 100m winning the league would

> have been good to see. Call me an old romantic,

> but I'd like to have seen that and Mourinho's

> tactics against Liverpool were just destructive, I

> don't like to see that winning through either.

> Rodgers showed some weaknesses too of course.

>

> Man City are a possession team with the best

> players.

>

> Liverpool was very much, we will score more than

> you. Great fun and the best season for a while,

> for me.

>

> What will be interesting is whether Liverpool now

> spend as the others have done. They will probably

> need to as they significantly overperformed their

> resources this year.



i agree entirely

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm all for taking a younger team to the WC and hope he drops the likes of Lampard.


BUT


If we do get to say a quarter final and Baines gets injured, I think I'd have liked to have had Cole's experience to step in. Not a fan of the man but can't really fault the player even if he is past his peak.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the target is 2016 then to find England in

> later stages this summer will be invaluable for

> younger players

>

> All bonus

>

> Targeting this tournament is unrealistic



Latter stages? If England are good enough to get out of their group they are a better team than I thought.

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

Noone thought too much about the euro 96 team going into it, amazing how a bit of success can turn a national mood around and make legends out of players, people were screaming for shearer to be dropped prior to that, leave alone the likes of sick-note!!


Of course in reality I'm invclined to agree....but the national mood could do with a bit of lifting (or are my just projecting my own mood thanks to these endless EFFING GREY CLOUDS!!!!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...