Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does Manchester have a same city rivalry after

> all

> > only one of the two is actually in Manchester?

> > Just saying

>

> Manchester United

> Sir Matt Busby Way

> Old Trafford

> Manchester

> M16 0RA

>

> Trafford is a borough of Manchester, just as

> Islington is a borough of London. Just saying...


And Woolwich...that's a borough too :)

This time last season Leicester were bottom of the table and about to commence their great run of wins that helped them avoid relegation.

I wonder what odds then of them being premier league champions in 2016 ?

If they were an athlete or cyclist with that kind of improvement they would likely be accused of being drugs cheats.

I'm sure they're not, as team sports don't work that way, but I wonder what elements have all come together st once in such a short period of time to achieve these kind of gains?

I think most football pundits are useless, with a few exceptions, but I can't blame any of them for not picking Leicester or Spurs as their tips for the title at the start of the season. Who could possibly have predicted that?

I don't think the slump of the usual title challengers could have been predicted either. Let's see if pundits will think twice before trotting out their usual lazy tips next season. I'm not so sure the other 'big' teams will be back next season. All may have new managers and could be in a state of flux for a season or two so an unlikely candidate for title may emerge again.

Leicester aside, what I'm incredulous about this season is the (mostly) nouveau Arsenal fans and "celebrities" like Piers Moron and their sense of entitlement, complaining about Arsene Wenger, saying he should go. I find it unbelievable after all the stability and success he's brought them down the years. Just because they haven't won the Premiership for over a decade. Try being a Spurs fan or a Leicester fan, come to think of it.


Obviously, I'm not including our own Parkdrive or Lady Gooner in this assessment but I'd be interested to hear what they think about it.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I said West Ham would struggle. Well, they will

> struggle to get into the top four with their

> upcoming fixtures.

> Joking aside, it's hard to predict who will finish

> top 4 now, let alone back in August, but I hope

> West Ham do if it's at the expense of Arse or

> City...


Don't worry I had Leicester going down!


I think (this season) we are as good as anyone to be honest, away wins at City, Liverpool, Everton, Arsenal (and should have been Man U support that) - If we'd had Payet fit all season who knows where we'd been.... I think we have a chance of top 4, but I think it's a small one.

Piers Morgan has been on Wenger's back for a few years now. He's gone quiet in last couple because Arsenal have won the cup. Wenger's a class act and should be treated with more respect by these plonkers. In some ways the Leicester story strengthens his own stance on transfer policy and overspending on players. He has always been uncomfortable splashing too much cash if it didn't represent good value. And he is right to think that. It hasn't helped City or United this season. Leicester have built a potentially Premier league winning squad on a shoestring. The current wisdom seems to be that he should go if they don't win the league, but I think that would be folly. All the big clubs will likely have new managers so if anything Arsenal should stick with him and his Premier league experience.

earlydoors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has always been

> uncomfortable splashing too much cash if it didn't

> represent good value. And he is right to think

> that. It hasn't helped City or United this season.


It's helped them in previous seasons though. I don't think you can use this season and Leicester's success as any kind of benchmark, unless they sustain it over a longer period. To go from certs for relegation to champions elect in one calendar year is totally freakish. Leicester haven't really built a team to win the PL either, a lot of the squad were in the Championship...

No but both represented reasonably good value when you compare to someone like Eric Lamela who cost ?30 million or even Di Maria at ?57 million. When Wenger did splash the cash he did it astutely.

I agree about Leicester's success being freakish, though I think they may have won the championship by a record total of points with essentially the same team.

Though perhaps not the template for success in EPL it resoundingly proves that it's not just about money. Forest did the same thing all those years ago to even greater success and in relative terms they were still paupers compared to Liverpool and Man Utd at the time.

Having said that I think they may have bought the first million pound player in Trevor Francis, but only after the success they achieved on a shoestring enabled them to do that.

Actually, Lamela is finally coming good and he's still only 23 and learning his trade so plenty of scope for him to get better and at ?26.5 million he could still prove to be very good value for money.


Francis was indeed the first million pound player and what Clough did at Forest is still unmatchable. If I wasn't a Spurs fan I'd be cheering Leicester on to win the league.

I don't think it's a good idea to have a coach who is also on the board of a club. The manager should be accountable to the board, not part of it. It creates a grey area on accountability. It's not working, his rewards are too great, his recent achievements too small and he needs independent scrutiny by a competitive board of directors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...