Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't you stick some money on Spurs to win the

> title recently, Quids?



I whilst back (16/1?) to ease my pain if the unthinkable happens - pains me to say it but I could see your quality back then. ( But the bottle wasn't there at our place :) )

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only good thing about tonight is the penny

> might drop with the board that you don't get into

> the champions league for free, you need to invest,

> and if you blend lack of investment with the wrong

> manager, you are buggered.

>

> On tonights score, this team is not good enough

> for any European competition.

>

> Slight reluctance to write off the manager is that

> Strachan lost 5-0 in his opening CL qualifier and

> failed to qualify. Next season beat AC Milan and

> Benfica to make the last 16, but this guy looks

> real bad so far, real bad.


As I said in August 2014 - this guy looks "real bad".....and sure enough he was

I don't know RD - we lost to quite a few teams I hadn't even heard of. That's real bad.


Anyway the press seem to think its:


Moyes

Lennon

O'Neill (Michael)

Brendan Rogers

Keane

Larsson

Coyle

Stubbs


Alternatively - none of the above as it turns out actually none of them want the job having seen what's on offer from the Celtic Board - then someone no one has ever heard of.


Of the above list I don't want Moyes - and I don't really know why - he happens to be favourite - nor Larsson or Coyle.

I see what you mean, I'd never heard of Rangers Newco either, where did they spring up from?!


Agree Moyes is a definite no, for obvious reasons.

Lennon would be like going out with an old girlfriend, there's a reason why you split up in the first place.

Michael O'Neill would be interesting, and Stubbs could be the dark horse...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know RD - we lost to quite a few teams I

> hadn't even heard of. That's real bad.

>

> Anyway the press seem to think its:

>

> Moyes

> Lennon

> O'Neill (Michael)

> Brendan Rogers

> Keane

> Larsson

> Coyle

> Stubbs

>

> Alternatively - none of the above as it turns out

> actually none of them want the job having seen

> what's on offer from the Celtic Board - then

> someone no one has ever heard of.

>

> Of the above list I don't want Moyes - and I don't

> really know why - he happens to be favourite - nor

> Larsson or Coyle.








Surely you can't want Keane!?!?

You said the same 2 years ago Jah. But even if the cleaning lady did that it won't be enough to save her from the sack.


You might be jesting but Michael O Neill is NI manager and won sports personality coach of the year.


He was manager of shamrock rovers when they played Spurs in the Europa a few years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a few years ago now, but I organised my end of year prom (for year 13) at Off the Cuff in Herne Hill - was on the cheaper side to rent and at that age, felt very cool and clubby. I had my own 18th at Whirled Cinema in Loughborough Junction but I'm not sure if they take event bookings like that anymore 
    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...