Jump to content

Recommended Posts

--------------------------

EDF Premier League

--------------------------


I have once again re-activated the fantasy footy league


We had quite a few teams last year so why not try your luck again.


If you use the same email as last year to register you should automatically join the league,


so just go to...


http://fantasy.premierleague.com


create a team & join,


Code to join this league: 355704-108123

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't think West Ham will do as well as last season because of the move. UP had a special, intimidating atmosphere, must've been worth 12-15 points a season, can't see the OS replicating that.

I think they have got themselves a potentially very good striker though in Ashley Fletcher. He was in front of Rashford in the Utd pecking order until he went out on loan to Barnsley. Wouldn't surprise me if he became another 'Pogba' in 4-5 years time...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was an offer at work for free tickets, they

> literally can't give them away.

>

> I was tempted just to see the stadium, but I can't

> really be arsed.


I just had a look at their website out of curiosity and it's showing tonights game and the Juventus game as being sold out.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Our first game at Taxpayers Park tonight - I'm not

> going, really can't get into football on the 4th

> of August, but was underwhelmed by our performance

> last week and this has got 'Banana Skin' written

> all over it....


No banana skin, good result and the stadium full looked good too. What's your first game there?...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Our first game at Taxpayers Park tonight - I'm

> not

> > going, really can't get into football on the

> 4th

> > of August, but was underwhelmed by our

> performance

> > last week and this has got 'Banana Skin'

> written

> > all over it....

>

> No banana skin, good result and the stadium full

> looked good too. What's your first game there?...


A West Ham supporting friend (regular at Upton park) went last night and surprisingly (as I thought he would defend it) he said sitting in the top tier was horrible- so disconnected from the match, no atmosphere etc.

Heard mixed from forums and a couple of mates - not all finished but people say:


- they reckon will be good atmosphere for big games

- bits still need fixing

- upper tier a long way off

- many views not bad

- policing will be difficult for big games as so many ways to get there plus open space etc!

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Heard mixed from forums and a couple of mates -

> not all finished but people say:

>

> - they reckon will be good atmosphere for big

> games


I think so too, esp if WH are as generous with the away allocation as they were at UP.



> - policing will be difficult for big games as so

> many ways to get there plus open space etc!


I was thinking that this morning when I heard a bloke on the radio describing how lovely it was last night walking through the Olympic Park, admiring the boats etc. That's because there were no away fans there last night, just wait until the hordes of northern monkeys arrive :) ...

The other thing i've been told is that it was an absolute nightmare getting to the station after the game. Fans were kettled into one queue and one queue only to the station and it took forever.


My friend lives four stops from Stratford on the central line and from leaving the stadium it took him an hour and a half to get home.

It's a shame EP doesn't post on here anymore, he was very much against the whole corporate football club model, saying it wasn't about the CL, revenue streams etc, and that he would rather keep the then exisitng identity and ethos of WH even if it meant struggling to stay in the PL and occasional relegation. A few years have since passed and we now have a WH that has a flashy new stadium with lots of corporate boxes and sponsors, a club that has bought into the whole branding business model, a club wanting to be challenging for the top 4/CL and trophies. Just curious to see how he now feels about it all. Other WH fans on here seem to have accepted the change, certainly haven't heard any dissenting voices...

I had the same conversation with an Orient fan- who accused West Ham of selling their soul etc.


As a Spurs fan I feel - without wishing to sound patronising - that once you are challenging top 4/6/8 of the Premier League, your decisions as a club aren't just made on retaining character and atmosphere; they're focused on financial betterment, success, playing in competitions against the very best teams and atmosphere & character. For better or worse.


I think all clubs in West Ham's position would've bitten hands off to take the Olympic Stadium, at the price being offered.

I have all but given up on airing dissent re WH. When BFS was in charge I would have given almost anything for a change and at least we got that. I said at the time i would rather have lower league football of the right kind than PL the Allardyce way.


I also said a long while back that I thought the new stadium would be an atmosphere killer with a feeling of detachment for lots of fans but it's done and there's no point carrying on -


The one thing I really hate is the new badge.


They've been tinkering with it for years but this shitty little shield looks like something you'd see on a pack of sausages. 'Hammer Brand, 100% Pork'. And putting 'London' on it shows the way the owners think - marketing and making money out of what they hope will become a more global brand.


I bet there's a file knocking around Sulli-Towers marked "How we get the name changed to the London Hammers".


Still, maybe tradition IS all bollocks and just for miserable old gits like me to mutter over in the pub and a whole new swathe of keen young fans will love it because it's easier to get tattooed. C'est la football eh?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1. Spurs (I can dream can't I?)

> 2. Liverpool (No European distractions)

> 3. Chelsea (Ditto)

> 4. Man Utd (just pip a disappointing Man City to

> 4th)

>

> Relegated -

>

> Middleboro

> Hull City

> Watford



This gets harder each year. Can make a case for half a dozen teams to win it, so I'll follow Jah's lead and go with my heart...


1. Man Utd

2. Man City

3. Spurs

4. Chelsea



Relegated...


Watford

Burnley

Hull

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...