Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have kids aged 9, 6 and 3 who enjoy both. But we have visited DKH more and had birthdays there too. Although we don't have major preferences I do find that the facilities in DKH are a bit more dated, but the indoor space is bigger than the one in Peckham. I have had some unsavoury encounters with other children who are shall we say "not so nice" in DKH as opposed to Peckham which did put me off going to DKH for a while, which was a shame...I'm talking 6 year olds bullying and swearing and that's at me not the children!

Yes as number 2 found apparently from next week no under 5s will be allowed on any of the play structures. We had fun today with a group of 4 and 2.5 year olds - a shame it will be a while before we can go again!!


Oh - just to add - I thought it was easier to keep track of everyone than dkh - just better visibility and fewer dark corners.

Given DKH and Peckham Rye clearly state 8+ (or 5+ on some parts of Southwark website relating Peckham Rye) on their websites I don't understand why people so keen to thrust much younger children in there. Plenty of, adventurous, playspaces available for younger children and why should older children in Adventure playgrounds designed for them have to look out for, and in some instances have their play restricted by, 2, 3, 4, 5 year olds?

vesti Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Given DKH and Peckham Rye clearly state 8+ (or 5+

> on some parts of Southwark website relating

> Peckham Rye) on their websites I don't understand

> why people so keen to thrust much younger children

> in there. Plenty of, adventurous, playspaces

> available for younger children and why should

> older children in Adventure playgrounds designed

> for them have to look out for, and in some

> instances have their play restricted by, 2, 3, 4,

> 5 year olds?


Could be something to do with having more than one child to cater for rather than 'thrusting' them in there lol! Try separating my was 4 now 5-year old from his 8-year old brother for example! Most people monitor and look after the younger ones and keep them on few more suitable areas of the PR one or just on the grassy areas anyway so as to avoid 'restricting' the play of older ones.

snowboarder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes as number 2 found apparently from next week no

> under 5s will be allowed on any of the play

> structures. We had fun today with a group of 4 and

> 2.5 year olds - a shame it will be a while before

> we can go again!!

>

> Oh - just to add - I thought it was easier to keep

> track of everyone than dkh - just better

> visibility and fewer dark corners.

Its always great to hear feedback on the playground. Whilst we state 8 plus, this is when children are left unnatended.


We welcome under 5's as many parents come with a mixture of ages & some kids who have been coming from when they were babies even so are used to the structures & space. We love having the mothers in with their babes in arms!


I know we are in need of un updated building, I regularly day dream about how wonderful one would be! Be great to have your email addresses so i could get an idea of what facilities you would like to see.


Sorry for those that have experienced rude children.


Feel free to message us anytime


Kate x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not convinced that BoE calculator tackles house prices. I think it's only goods and services - e.g. I think 465k in 1997 would buy you the same amount of bananas as £929k would now. but it can't include house prices. Or bitcoins or shares or other investments.
    • It's really not that complex.  There are some long standing Green Party supporters whose primary concern is the environment (who deplore hatred).  There are some left leaning centrists who are disappointed with the Labour party's performance in government who are looking for an alternative socialist party to vote for.  And there are some rabid antisemites who used to get away with that in Labour but found themselves homeless after the EHCR decided  Labour was guilty of unlawful discrimination. It's pretty simple actually.
    • It's not taxes on motoring. It's taxes on value.  The problem for you, and for the government, is that those taxes increase the cost of living exponentially. It doesn't matter whether you buy fuel or not. Everything else you buy relies on someone else who does buy fuel. I'm amazed you can't see that. 
    • Nope, it was because she thought people who owned houses were good Tories.  Yes, she didn't want workers being represented by workers.  She believed that the individual should take responsibility for their own pay and conditions, whether that was possible or not. I'll talk more about the lessons of Thatcher another time, one of my faves is energy policy (ie let's use much of our North Sea gas to generated electricity rather than save some for future generations....) From AI (a longer piece on objectives, pros and cons so there is some sort of balance)  Ideological Transformation & Voting Patterns: By turning working-class, often Labour-voting council tenants into homeowners, she sought to shift their political loyalty to the Conservative party, which she believed was rewarded.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...