Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi John K,

We've been in consultation with a landscape architect and the park management who all felt that there would be no issue with drainage. Owing to the proposed position, which is at the higher end of the park, the gentle slope should allow the water to run off freely. There is an area of lower ground nearby which, we have been told by the park management, has never had a problem with drainage. So we feel positive that the area will remain a groundwork and not a water feature!

  • 4 weeks later...

barniepage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think anyone is going to be very happy

> about the final decision that has been made about

> this :(

> Except for the artist that won


I'll let you know if I am thanks.

Not my favourite but I like that, like the Hepworth, you can be in it and on it. I also like that its slightly resistant to the "community arts" feel of the raised stage area (though I liked that one too).


There was so much love for the raised performance area I think we should now being campaigning for a contemporary (covered) bandstand. There are so many brilliant local music groups and choirs and school ensembles that could use it and I can't think of anything nicer in a park on a summers' afternoon .Maybe near the cafe?

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> barniepage Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't think anyone is going to be very happy

> > about the final decision that has been made

> about

> > this :(

> > Except for the artist that won

>

> I'll let you know if I am thanks.


I am, that was my choice.

I think this is a great choice.

I personally would love to see a cast concrete version of the barbara hepwoth, to go where the old one was, as a reminder of what stood there.

Sort of like how renaissance sculptures end up in the museuum, but a replica is put in the original setting.

barniepage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Conrad Shawcross ugly metal things to be installed

> in the park:

> http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/ar

> t/news/barbara-hepworth-sculpture-stolen-from-dulw

> ich-park-to-be-replaced-with-antitheft-works-by-co

> nrad-shawcross-8892880.html


Nowhere near as ugly as the Hepworth piece. One of my all-time least favourite pieces of public art.

Ryan Gander's piece, aside from the earth work that would have provided a dynamic space, would have directly supported youth performing arts projects in South London with about ?80,000 over the course of the next 10 years. Art with a function, art for the public.


Instead the commissioners have picked a useless and non-site-specific piece of art that is, according to those two specifications, no different to the Hepworth that was put there 40 years ago. One might have thought that the idea of "public art" might have advanced somewhat in that time.


But I suppose, after all, in these austere times, it's better to spend the full whack on a useless sculpture than on a project that gives money to local youth projects.

barniepage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ryan Gander's piece, aside from the earth work

> that would have provided a dynamic space, would

> have directly supported youth performing arts

> projects in South London with about ?80,000 over

> the course of the next 10 years. Art with a

> function, art for the public.

>

> Instead the commissioners have picked a useless

> and non-site-specific piece of art that is,

> according to those two specifications, no

> different to the Hepworth that was put there 40

> years ago. One might have thought that the idea of

> "public art" might have advanced somewhat in that

> time.

>

> But I suppose, after all, in these austere times,

> it's better to spend the full whack on a useless

> sculpture than on a project that gives money to

> local youth projects.


Remember, public art has long since been rubbish anodyne nonsense, usually picked by a committee that knows more about money than it does about art, or what's good for the community; viz. the crap that's been on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Sq. Well, the Wallinger piece was great, but the Whiteread one was dull ( and horribly misjudged in terms of materials) but my God the Big Blue Cock (fnar) is desperately bad and the Bill Woodrow was one of the worst bits of public art in any city ever.


It doesn't help that, like Henry bloody Moore, Hepworth is seen as a safe bet artwise, despite the fact that, like Henry bloody Moore, her stuff is ugly, lumpen, graceless crap with no meaning or concept.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...