Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry, read in Gumtree on a post (few weeks ago) ("which forum shall we hijack next?") that there are a few unsavoury people who actually take pleasure in trying to hijack forums as group,although they pretend not to know eachother, just back up eachother's sick claims or beliefs, their rantings and ravings are of a particularly offensive nature and include topics such as racist views, sexist views etc. their whole purpose is to cause as much racial/any other offensive tension or upset people and offend people on forums. I have checked out a lot of the dates that some of the particularly nice "newbies" have joined, and surprise surprise quite a few of them are newly registered.


DO NOT GET DRAWN INTO THEIR DISCUSSIONS (Leave them to talk amongst themselves, they'll get bored and go away soon or if you do wish to interact, do so knowing they set out to inflame and offend.

We've seen off your common-or-garden trolls before, we'll see this lot off too.

Great thing about this forum is we have thick skins and a good sense of humour (well, I speak for others obviously, I'm a humourless t0sspot, but that's another matter entirely).


Or is this classic reverse psychology working here? You're one of them aren't you!!!!!!!


;-)

I don't think of myself as a much of woolly liberal, let alone a radical revolutionary, just don't fancy engaging in debate with a stranger who aggressively pigeon-holed me before I'd so much as stated a view. I use this forum to have discussions or chats with my neighbours, and to be part of a community. That said, there are plenty of members of the community whose bottoms aren't parked in SE London!

"WHO's That Trip-Trapping Over My Bridge?


It's only me, the littlest Billy-goat Gruff..."


Ah, happy thought. You'll hear those words ringing from the Moos household often and often, it's one of Moosling's favourites. I think he likes the troll more than the billygoats though, he loses interest after the troll Falls Off The Bridge and Into the Deep Water. "There was a mighty splash! and he did not come up again. So that was the end of the ugly troll. From that time on, people went over the bridge without fear..."


Sorry, I'll stop now.


(for the sake of niceness, I'll confirm that I really was happily quoting a children's story I often read to my son, and am not comparing any poster with the ugly drowned troll)

Oh Moos, thank you!

I mentioned the story of The Three Billy Goats Gruff another lovely forumite over lunch the other day and she'd never heard of it. I was quiet surprised, I thought it was one of thoses stories that all children read and loved.


We used to play it on a foot bridge in near my Grandparents house with my Grandpa (after morning service still dressed in dog collar and sometimes even cassock) being the troll and me and my sisters being billy goats.


Happy memories and an altogether different kind of troll. :))

I loved that story!


With regards all these "trolls", lets just be aware that some people may come on here and genuinely have some different opinions to the norm, which is allowed!!!


I just don't want to get to the point where people are being run out of town for voicing an opinion that doesn't match those of the majority, when actually they are just local people using the forum.

  • Administrator

What Keef said.


Added: New people should not be put off expressing their views unless they are of course they are in breach of the rules. As always should you see anything that does break the rules please report them and we will deal with them as we see fit. This may involve setting the winged monkeys on them.


[edited once]

Expressing a view is one thing, but being offensive with your views is another. No disrespect is intended to Mr Administrator but at what point would you actually step in and say, "calm it down a bit now folks, getting a bit offensive there"?



(oops, belatedly scurries off to read rules!) :-S

To take Keef's point about Trolls - I genuienely got quite a lot of abuse for my first post on here for (provocatively admittetdly) pointing out that the feckless incapable idiots who cant manage their bank accounts properly had given the majority free banking for the past 10 years - which is now going to disappear thanks to the court action against banks. I've already seen some 'evidence' that a new poster on here is being identified as 'troll' 'cos he's not in the cozy club......I think as admin and Keef point to, the 'liberal' consensus on here isn't always that liberal about divergent views....but, hey, that's lefty liberals the world over.....;-)

I'm a bit slaughtered lamb right now....jeeez, i can spell...just about.


Somewhere the point is, if you take part then such is. If you wilfully wish to make things bad then that's just not good, or right, or whatever the word need be. If you wish to partake, then marvellous, no one cares if you worhsip Satan, Mammon, Jesus, Mohammed or the Hurdy-Gurdy mushroom man, just be true to yourself.

Moos wrote:It's only me, the littlest Billy-goat Gruff..."


I heard this on childrens hour at 9am on Saturday mornings on the 'light programme' now radio 2.

It takes me right back to the mid-fifties, and it was presented by some old codger called 'Uncle Mack'. I presume he was old because he died soon afterwards.

He would only play a portion of it spread over three weeks, because he thought it 'too long' for one show.

Inevitably I would miss one of the parts due to over sleeping, or being dragged out to the shops by my mother.

Another favourite was The runaway train, who went over the hill and he blewwwwwwww and the last I heard he was going still...............

Yes those were the days when trolls were mythical creatures crossing bridges not 'crossing us forumistas'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...