Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear forumites,


My DS will be 4 in July next year, which I feel is a bit young to start school full time in September, so am thinking of sending him part time and keeping him at nursery part time, and gradually increasing the school and reducing the nursery hours. Has anyone else done this? Would love to hear from you?!


Thanks,


M

I've no direct experience of your case, but I do remember that his settling in process at school was stretched over 3 weeks - so the children do have a lengthy settling in period anyway. Reception class is also very similar to nursery, so if you were still going to send your son to nursery as well I don't think it would make too much difference in terms of tiredness etc.


Also, the change from 'school' to 'nursery' on a regular basis may be a little disruptive. I have a friend who's son was 4 on 2nd September and as a result he's started school nursery for the part time allocation, but then goes to his day nursery for the rest of the time. However, because the day nursery is in the same location, he's getting very confused and she's thinking of stopping that.


If you feel that your son will be too young to start school in September next year, then I would consider deferring entirely until January/Easter, rather than trying to do both (which basically will just mean more to-and fro-ing for you too!). But don't forget, there is still a year to go, and the little ones grow up a LOT between 3 and 4, so you may feel much happier next summer.


Hope this helps!

My August born son started reception in September at just 4 and thrived. I was worried about settling as he was so young and also shy, but in fact he loved it. I think that it is probably easier for them to settle if they are doing full days as that is what everyone else is doing. They seemed to mostly play all day, inside and out, with free play, home corner and other activities, so much like nursery with a bit of phonics in the morning and maybe a maths activity thrown in somewhere.

I would agree that deferring to Jan might be better than going part time, but would recommend full time based on our experience.

With a June birthday, maybe 3/4 of the class will be older, and 1/4 younger.... not a bad place to be!

Well worth asking to discuss with the school as well as they might give an idea of practicalities, or perhaps reassure you.

My daughter is also 30th August and started reception last year. I talked with the school beforehand about her going part time as I was worried about tiredness. She had about 2 weeks of only going in a few days/part days (their normal settling in procedure), and by the end of that she was FURIOUS when I said she might not want to go in every day (she loves it so much). So she went full time (and was fine, although ocassionally napped at the weekend).
I went to look at a school this morning and was reassured by the reception set up which really didn't look much different to nursery with kids hurling in and out and playing with mud etc. Also talked to the staff about how they work with the younger ones, so feeling much more relaxed.

Is your son the eldest / only child?


My 2 year old is a late July baby, but she's the younger sister (her sister was 4 in April and has just started school). Even though the older one is nearly 4.5, she still seems so little to be going to school. I think the younger one will be raring to go in a couple of years time though.

I really don't understand the point of differing the start date until January when the rest of the children have already settled in and made friends; this seem more disruptive to me than starting in September. Normally most reception classes give lots of freedom to the children and have a slow introduction to school

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then do I agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...