Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bibimax Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Just been on the radio - Luke Wooster sounded

> dire

>

> He's a nice bloke, leave him alone

>

> Poor man's got very young twins to contend with.



I almost didn't recognise him with the beard. Knew him years ago before he became an estate agent.

I had mixed feelings about the BBC clip. It wasn't very insightful at all, but then trying to address such a complex issue as gentrification in a two-minute segment was never going to be I suppose.


I'm sure I'll get vilified for this, but I also don't understand what the problem is with people who have a bit of money wanting to move to the area. Why shouldn't they come here?


I also don't see why people appear to have an issue with all the new restaurants and bars that have opened in Peckham recently and which, in my opinion, have made the area a nicer place to be. There's now far more choice of venues in which to spend a bit of my hard-earned cash, and I enjoy going to Lot9, Peckham Refreshment Rooms, Franks and other places. However, some people seem to deride these places as "hipster" and as the middle-classes taking over.


I feel that people are very much overreacting to it all as well. A few bars may have opened up, but Peckham is still not a posh place overall, and it definitely isn't anywhere near the level of East Dulwich. If you've been down Rye Lane recently (as I do every day), you could hardly call it gentrified. It's still the scruffy place that it always was (in recent times at least - it used to be lovely 50 years ago) and not one of the shops is a place I'd describe as "gentrified".


It also baffles me when people say they don't want to see new money in the area, but they are keen to see the station done up and Rye Lane improved. Surely that in itself is gentrification - it's making Peckham a "posher" and more appealing place to be.


Anyhow, it's an interesting debate and I'd like to hear what others have to say on the matter.

Surely we all know the downside of gentrification. Rising rates for established local businesses, increasing rent and house prices for existing residents. People can feel they've lost their stake in the local area. People are forced to move out, communities are lost.


The Bellenden Rd area has without doubt undergone substantial gentrification in recent years. Rye Lane is arguably in "stage one" gentrification where we've started to see an artistic community, nightlife (therefore the "hipster" element), events, and unloved properties being put to good use. Time will tell whether this leads to full-on middle class invasion.


From a selfish point of view, I'm happy that there are now a few bars and restaurants around, and that the area's coming up in the world. But the process comes at a price.

I agree there are downsides to gentrification - namely, the ones that Jeremy has mentioned.


But is there anything really wrong with, as you put it, "unloved properties being put to good use"? And surely there are lots of positives to gentrification too - for example, more nice bars and restaurants to enjoy and a more pleasant streetscape (as we will hopefully see if the plans for the station go ahead).


Personally I think it's good when an area comes up in the world rather than staying down at heel. Would people rather Peckham was like Catford? Now that is ungentrified!


By the way, with regard to Rye Lane, I really can't see it becoming middle class in my life time. The Greggs near the top is still burnt out and there isn't one shop on the street that is aiming at a middle class clientele. I really can't see it changing any time soon.


(Edited to add in a missing word)

If people are worried about gentrification and the up and downside it brings perhaps pressure could be brought to bear on Southwark Council to renovate properties they own.


This would make the area better for all


A classic example is Chadwick Road from ?Bellenden Village? to Grove Park. Home owners there are defeated in their efforts to make the area acceptable because Southwark does not look after its properties and never have done.


New/old owners who renovated their properties are surrounded by dross on the street. It is amazing that grants were given to all, including ?Bellenden Village? and surrounding streets but not Chadwick Road which has been left. However Grove Park which follows on is looked after very well as is Camberwell Grove and Grove Lane


I have been here 47 years and have seen the Council bigging up some areas/streets to the determent of others.

If the Council wont do anything don?t knock others that come in and do.

I have no problem with referring to Rye Lane as, or hearing it referred to as Little Africa.


I think it is great. But I do get the feeling there is an underlying wish to 'change it back' to something it probably never really was.


I accept Eileen's point that her quote may have been taken out of context as part of a long interview. That's the problem with TV shows, but Peckham Vision members are hardly representative of the every day people you see down Rye Lane. Neither is The Peckham Society (of which I am a member).


I look forward to the station being opened out!

Hi spider69, I haven't walked down Chadwick Road for ages - what are the issues with the council properties there? I know there are quite a few on that street.


And I agree, I don't know why people knock others who come into the area and make improvements to their homes. It brings up the area and makes it a nicer place to live for everybody! I am pleased to see Peckham coming up in the world again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A festival-style trolley that will fit in a hatch back. For moving son into halls at uni with a very far away car park!  Thanks    Lottie   
    • Hi, my daughter has a basic electric keyboard she really should clear out of her old room. It's a classic beginners one. Are you interested?  If so, I'll photograph it and find the name.    Lottie 
    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...