Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One - one - young woman was being led away by two border police/agency people. Two more were on the door of Le Chardon. I asked why it took four people to take one person away. Embarrassed smiles and perfunctory claptrap followed. Oh, and then - comic gods be thanked - a fifth officer walked out to see what all the fuss was about.....

Some time ago, a friend of mine went out with a copper. One night he was called to a domestic tiff. Turned out the bloke causing all the trouble collected and was extremely competent with samurai swords. Almost killed said copper. Bloke ended up going down for attempted murder.


Essentially, the police often do not know what situation they may encounter. And the public turn out to be flipping rubbish at judging situations.


I think living London is a difficult job. It's not one many people could do and fact as I think the ads used to say "I couldn't. Could you?"

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I asked why it took four people to take one person away.


Surely they have the right to take sensible precautions, in case it turns nasty? Or should just one or two of them go, to make it a fair fight?

Sorry , I am not used to different kind of protection vests . They were just padded and I assumed bullet proof as I have never heard anyone say knife proof before ( wouldn't bullet proof be knife proof too?).

I did think it might be an immigration crime after seeing their operation enforcement van but they did turn lots of heads as its not something you see often of in Dulwich.

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry , I am not used to different kind of

> protection vests . They were just padded and I

> assumed bullet proof as I have never heard anyone

> say knife proof before ( wouldn't bullet proof be

> knife proof too?).


Stab proof vests are often worn by ordinary PCs or UKBA forces. Bullet proof vests would only be worn by armed officers in situations where they were deemed needed.


And a stab proof vest is much lighter and wouldn't stand a chance of stopping live ammo. Only thick, heavy kevlar will do so.


I sometimes wonder why I know this stuff...

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sorry , I am not used to different kind of

> > protection vests . They were just padded and I

> > assumed bullet proof as I have never heard

> anyone

> > say knife proof before ( wouldn't bullet proof

> be

> > knife proof too?).

>

> Stab proof vests are often worn by ordinary PCs or

> UKBA forces. Bullet proof vests would only be worn

> by armed officers in situations where they were

> deemed needed.

>

> And a stab proof vest is much lighter and wouldn't

> stand a chance of stopping live ammo. Only thick,

> heavy kevlar will do so.


Actually the first "bullet proof" vests effective against handguns were made from cross woven silk by a Catholic priest from Chicago in the early 1900s. The Archduke Franz Ferdinand was actually wearing one when he was shot. Unfortunately he was shot in the neck.

>

> I sometimes wonder why I know this stuff...


A show called Weaponology on Discovery Channel?

That would be immigration most likely overstayers.seen quite few there vans around london this week they do checks all time just 1 way they found effective catching overstayers.


seems alot but as said they dont know what they being called to and caution better than none.

lovely place le chardon.

"Actually the first "bullet proof" vests effective against handguns were made from cross woven silk"


The Mongols didn't wear much armour at all, many wore none bar a silk shirt. If you were shot by an arrow it wouldn't break but be dragged into the body surrounding the arrowhead and be very easy to pull out without causing further damage.



...



what david_carnell said......

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nigello Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One - one - young woman was being led away by

> two

> > border police/agency people.

>

>

> I hope it wasn't the little dark haired french

> girl. She was too nice to give away.


If she was actually French then it won't be her, it would only be non EU bods. Free movement and all that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...