Jump to content

Recommended Posts

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Like painting Bollards pretty colours and

> carving

> > Totem Poles.

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> You forgot the twinkly lights outside the station

> that need mending at huge expense



I was going to mention them. but was not sure who paid for them...


I know James Barber was ecstatic with them when they were first installed.



Foxy

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Council spends our Taxes on more important

> things..

>

> Like painting Bollards pretty colours and carving

> Totem Poles.

>


xxxxxxx


As someone told you not long ago on a different thread, Foxy, the two things come from totally different council budgets......

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Council spends our Taxes on more important

> > things..

> >

> > Like painting Bollards pretty colours and

> carving

> > Totem Poles.

> >

>

> xxxxxxx

>

> As someone told you not long ago on a different

> thread, Foxy, the two things come from totally

> different council budgets......


They may come from different budgets.. BUT they get most of their money from Council Tax Payers.


They need to Prioritise their Budgets.... and put the money into the ones that benefit the community most.


Foxy.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pathetic how firms employed by the council can

> only make a pavement last 5-6 years before it

> fails. puddles collect in the depressions, it's a

> big con.


Does Southwark use more than one contractor?


John K

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> They may come from different budgets.. BUT they

> get most of their money from Council Tax Payers.

>

> They need to Prioritise their Budgets.... and put

> the money into the ones that benefit the community

> most.

>


xxxxxxx


Don't think it works like that .....

By a convenient coincidence, I offered to cover for James on the East Dulwich Environmental Audit just two days ago on Weds. This is a basic walkabout of hotspot areas with environmentally trained Community Wardens, Councillors, and interested residents, but it takes place during the day when the ED cllrs are at work, and I live on Melbourne Gr and I know the area well, so I volunteered.


We spent about 2 hours from 11am until around 1pm looking at every crack in the pavement on both sides of Lordship Lane, down Grove Vale into the bottom of Melbourne, with the Community Warden calling in repairs to the control room as we went along.


There was a Conways person fixing the bits of the pavement on Lordship that James had already ordered, but we called in every rocking slab and trip hazard that qualified for repair, including the section down at the end of Melbourne by the hairdressers (which has been fixed at least twice already but it keeps coming up).


Unfortunately the dips in the pavement don't qualify as trip hazards, even though the 'ponding' from the rain is pretty bad, so they will need a different budget to address. But I think we got most of the obvious problems (we just need to keep our eye on it to make sure the repair request is followed up).


I remember when Lordship was completely repaved over ten years ago (can't remember exact date), before I was a councillor... in my opinion it wasn't done very well to begin with, which is why we continue to have problems now. But I don't think Lordship will qualify for repaving any time soon... you'd probably have to use the tiny devolved ward budgets and redo it in sections, as I think to fix it properly it would have to get torn out completely and rebedded. The bit at the Goose Green end is the best but there are sections in the middle and up towards the police station that have been diabolical for years.

Don't even get me started! The Yorkstone on Blackwater is still intact, I drool everytime I walk on them... but the Victorians didn't have telephone and broadband cables and gas pipes running under the pavements, this is what affects the choice of materials and permanency of the workmanship - it's a trade-off between stability and ease of access underneath.

Hi Alice... no, wards have a tiny devolved highway budget as well. You could do it with CGS, but CGS is more for things like trees and the hanging baskets and public realm and community projects.


The CGS program has just been launched, you could try putting in a bid for a section of pavement if you wanted to, but I think the highways budget is more appropriate.


In Village ward we use devolved highway budget for sections of paving that probably wouldn't get funded out of the internal highway budget for ages. For instance, we're chipping away at resurfacing the tarmac paving along Dulwich Village from East Dulwich Grove up to the entrance of Dulwich Park, it's taking ages but we're getting there.

thanks but you misunderstand me - I was referring to the way that cgs funding can be used by individuals to provide work that would not otherwise get commisioned and does not provide value for money. Its a pity that safety eg lighting, pavement surfaces etc cannot be prioritised.

Maybe I didn't explain very well, I can see how it looks that way to you, but the lobbying for funding is very complex. Lighting and pavement funding comes from very large internal budgets, sometimes awarded from national budgets, which have very strict criteria and there is a lot of competition from the different wards to access chunks of it and projects are assessed and prioritised by internal engineers. For instance, we have a lighting priority list.


CGS is a tiny budget, subject to specific criteria, not usually enough to do a whole road or pavement, but can be used for one-off capital decorative embellishments that give a community identity, like the hanging baskets (actually I think ED use devolved revenue for hanging baskets, but we use CGS in Village for complicated reasons).


Some works might not look like good value for money, but might be really important to the community... in Village we are using CGS to renovate one of the lodges in Dulwich Park to bring it back into community use as it is deteriorating badly and about to be condemned and we haven't been able to get a budget from anywhere else. To some, this might seem a frivolous use of public money, but in Village we are very heritage-concious and value public spaces.


I really encourage you and other residents to submit a bid if you feel strongly about something.

Ah, hang on, I think I just realised what you meant... but technically CGS is a capital budget and not to be used by a group for providing "services". The CGS revenue budget is different, it's more for services, but can't be used for paving or lighting which is a capital expense. Sorry if this sounds contradictory. For instance, in Village, we used our devolved CGS revenue budget to continue the Lollipop school crossing guard services when the council ceased the internal funding.

rch Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi John... there is a complicated bidding process

> which Conways is very successful at. From what I

> can tell from your posts, I think your problem

> with Conway is more with the managerial overseeing

> process.


Maybe CONways win "bids" because they have lots of permanant staff based in the town hall. How does a private company have staff in the town hall, surely thats unfair advantage/conflict of interest, rch? This also means that council tax payers are paying for a profit making private companys office space, paper, printing etc doesn't it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...