Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spam- yuk. Corned beef- yum.

>

> xxxxxx

>

> I just bought some corned beef from Iceland.

> Corned beef hash, making a comeback. Retro,

> innit.

>

> Shippams paste, YEH.

>

> Memo to self: Go To Bed.

>

> ETA: That's weird. As I posted this, the subject

> box is saying Re: F***s sake instead of the

> $(*&%&?y# stuff. How did that happen? Numbers,

> what did you originally type?


I typed 'fucks' I think, not sure why it isn't coming up as &*%?@ s in the subject box. Oops. Thank god I didn't write anything else.


How was your retro corned beef hash? Is that paste the sludgy looking pink/grey stuff in tiny glass jars?


vik - I don't remember sugar sandwiches but that's reminded me of a recipe book (I use the term loosely) I had from the 70s (think it was a kids one), that involved buttering sliced white bread, spooning loads of soft brown sugar on top and grilling till it caramelised!

hibbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Did you get a pineapple ring on top of your

> spam

> > fritter at school dinners?

>

>

> Yep we did...mmmm


pale, tasteless, dried-out, limp pineapple ring on top of spam fritters at my school too. think we got haggis fritters once

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I typed '@#$%&' I think, not sure why it isn't

> coming up as &*%?@ s in the subject box. Oops.

> Thank god I didn't write anything else.


Der, brain not engaged, pesky swear filter wins again. I typed f - u - c - k (no spaces) originally. Am I allowed to type that out here or will I get banned?

Blody fukking heel (this spelling gets around the EDF Swaar Filtar? BTW)


I'm genuinely fantasising about Spam Frittars?


That/those and mash and beans AND gravy


Oh god and this just jumped into my head "Spam Frittars? BLT"


Is this the Retro Futurism that radio 4 spoke of this week


I jolly well hope so !

Oh yes, UncleGlen and GSJ57, all those - except for the rabbit, for some reason.


Oh yum, condensed milk sandwiches :)) Toast and dripping - yum yum.


But in those days you could toast bread - and crumpets - over the coal fire on a toasting fork.


I tried that with smokeless fuel, and the toast tasted of chemicals and was completely inedible :(


ETA: I'm on a roll now.


"Cheesecakes" delivered in a basket to the door by Broomfields - puff pastry with some sort of filling then white icing and coconut strands on top.


Proper yoghurt in glass containers (I think) which was really sharp tasting and only came in vanilla or strawberry flavours.


Icecream blocks - vanilla, strawberry and pistachio.


Icecream cornets where you had to roll paper off the cylinder of icecream before you could eat them.


Sawdust in butchers' shops which you could scuff into little piles with your shoes.


Change whizzing round above your head in little tubes from some cashier's department in the sky.


Balls of wool, sixpence three farthings.


Walnut cake in Fullers (?).


Lyons corner shops.


Home and Colonial.


Oh God I'm history :(

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I typed '@#$%&' I think, not sure why it isn't

> > coming up as &*%?@ s in the subject box. Oops.

> > Thank god I didn't write anything else.

>

> Der, brain not engaged, pesky swear filter wins

> again. I typed f - u - c - k (no spaces)

> originally. Am I allowed to type that out here or

> will I get banned?


xxxxxxxx


The title is coming up in my gmail as F-u-c-ks sake - without the hyphens :))

puwetter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi all who wants to eat spam fritters chip shop in

> brockley dose yummy one still try them



only if they come with (Bachelors) processed peas - (N.B. NOT mushy peas)


ETA: coming up as F U C K S sake in my subject box too....

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> only if they come with (Bachelors) processed peas

> - (N.B. NOT mushy peas)

>


xxxxxxx


Bloody hell, do they still make processed peas?


I always far preferred them to the bright green tinned garden peas ...... more subtle colour and much tastier .......

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The bright green ones were 'marrow-fat peas' where

> did that come from?



Xxxxxx


Tinned "garden" peas were also bright green!


I thought marrrow fat peas were dried then reconstituted but hey it's a long time ago and my memory is crap at the best of times ....

Apart from Peas in their pods sold loose, all peas are processed. Are they not..?


Tinned peas, Frozen Peas. Dried peas...


Frozen Peas are considered the best as the process from being picked to being frozen is very short.

They are therefore 'Fresher' than loose peas in there pods which loose their flavour very quickly.



Foxy.

A cartoon crow, approached by another and asked " Where?s my dinner?"


First crow's response is


"Sorry mate you?re too late! The best peas went to Farrows!"


Knew how to make ads 'back in the day'


BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM Esso Blue. That was another one.


Used to be processed peas and blue paraffin as far as the eye could see.


And glad we were to go to bed of a night sated by the former and kept dangerously warm by the latter.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I loved the smell of Esso Blue in the mornings;

> the condensation on the prefab window, the red

> rimmed eyes, the 16 year-long chesty cough.


...the sound of Ride My See-Saw by The Moody Blues...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • Best to just get in touch with the council. You need to see what works were approved and the scope.  It's probably advisable to get an independent legal survey (not a standard RICS) and look at current condition, what they said they'd fix, if they did what they said and what the problems are with what they did. Was it just your flat and the other flat mentioned? Asking in case there's any other leaseholder/ tenant involved  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...