Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And yet several people who dont use that petrol station have also been cloned


I agree that the circumstantial evidence weighs against it. . But given that there are pages of people warning against using the machine there and yet people continue to do so i begin to wonder what the point is

Dont fall for the Banking industry lies - its their responsibility to sort this out - its not your money - their systems COULD be secure, but they chose to take the cheaper security options in order to maximise their credit card division profits - this is what happens when greed takes over sense


masters of their own problems - their huge profits were generated on the back of easy credit , like the billions of cards that they pumped out for decades and made money hand over fist.Obviously now they are a bit concerend, as they few % they built into their numbers for fraud write downs once seemed a small price to pay, it is now a serious issue as they scramble for liquidity and survival.


Dont blame the garage or its workers, thatsn not on

Well yes... the banks could use biometric devices or something, but they choose not to... but I'm sure that people would still find a way to crack the technology (although it would be harder to do).


But I don't see how they are more to blame than those who steal the money.


It's like having your car stolen, and blaming the car manufacturer for not making the car more secure.

penk Wrote:


> That would be moderately newsworthy, no?

>

> Funny how I can't find even a suggestion that that

> occurred, apart from on here.



I emailed customer support at Somerfield (as I said I would) and got nothing back. No surprise there. So I wrote to their Chief Exec saying that I understood that staff had been removed because of card cloning. Here's the response I received...

  • 1 year later...

Jeremy wrote on 25 February, 2009

-------------------------------------------------------

> for me the weight of circumstantial evidence against the petrol station over the

> last couple of years is too much to ignore.


Another conviction today, not the first, of people involved in petrol station card fraud. In this case they compromised the Pin Entry Devices to get card data, and then cloned cards for use principally in ATMs abroad. R4 You and Yours (in ?last ten minutes) reported on it, but it'll be in all the papers. Principal fraudster a 29 year old Sri Lankan software engineering graduate allegedly called Theogones De Montford.


It sounds all too easy to do, with the right expertise, in places where management is lax and possibly unsupervised access is easy.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


R4 You and Yours (in

> ?last ten minutes) reported on it, but it'll be in

> all the papers.


It has been in the papers already...


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1288492/Credit-card-fraudster-hits-35-000-motorists-petrol-station-scam.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

There's a little pice of kit called a key logger. It looks a bit like an adapter for the end of a computer cable. What it does is store all the data transfered through it and can be attached to any card reader or computer in any shop, restaurant etc. That data on that logger contains all your card details and pin etc and then the criminal makes a cloned card with the same data on it and they are off and away. It's actually very easy to do. And encryting data doesn't make any difference as there is software that can decrypt data at high speed. Basically unless you trust the establishment swiping your card, pay in cash.

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How did he get access to the machines? Did he

> get

> > jobs at all the garages??

>

>

> I looked at the article and it isn't clear.

> Assume he must have befriended managers.


xxxxxxx


That's quite worrying if there's so many managers who would go along with this :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
    • I see what you mean.  Perhaps the "alcohol licensing flyer for Tesco Express on the Poundland site" confirmed by the OP has been removed then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...