Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24786784


's funny how no one gave a shite about the station ( E.Conn and JD Beasley excepted of course )until the gentrification nazis did a bit of freelance lebensraum and began to embrace the hood


Has anyone got a graph showig the timeline between facile arriviste liberal art facilitator parasite nazi arrival and the de facto ethnic cleansing* of those who are not their type ?



* yes, emotive word but used in this case to prod the slumbering sunday morning masses

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/38110-peckham-rye-station/
Share on other sites

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone got a graph showig the timeline between

> facile arriviste liberal art facilitator parasite

> nazi arrival and the de facto ethnic cleansing* of

> those who are not their type ?


Something like this?


http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/09/mapping-gentrification

I'm not sure the station needs a ?25 million upgrade. There's a nice mix of businesses there at the moment, some older - the fruit and veg sellers, the hairdressers etc - and some welcome new additions, including Peckham Refreshment Rooms and a new coffee shop that's opening. Perhaps it could do with a little bit of a clean-up but other than that, what's wrong with the place as it is?


It's sad to hear that Blenheim Motors (mentioned in the BBC article) is under threat too. I thought the plans were only to refurbish the front of the station - has this now changed?


I worry that if this upgrade goes ahead, inevitably Starbucks, Costas and the like will move in, destroying the soul of the place and forcing the little independents out of business.

se84 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not sure the station needs a ?25 million

> upgrade. There's a nice mix of businesses there at

> the moment, some older - the fruit and veg

> sellers, the hairdressers etc - and some welcome

> new additions, including Peckham Refreshment Rooms

> and a new coffee shop that's opening. Perhaps it

> could do with a little bit of a clean-up but other

> than that, what's wrong with the place as it is?

>

> It's sad to hear that Blenheim Motors (mentioned

> in the BBC article) is under threat too. I thought

> the plans were only to refurbish the front of the

> station - has this now changed?

>

> I worry that if this upgrade goes ahead,

> inevitably Starbucks, Costas and the like will

> move in, destroying the soul of the place and

> forcing the little independents out of business.


The whole area is a pit and needs a full revamp. It may be trendy at the moment until the hipsters or what ever people are called etc move on and then we the local residents are left with something we have been trying for years to improve. We will be left with the dross yet again. The area always had soul. I have to admit the scrap yard does add a bit of class


From Rye Lane to Bellenden road the triangle needs removing. Look at the area without out the trendy rose tinted glasses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...