Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our old car has conked out so we're looking for a nearly new replacement- our priorities are:- it must be economical to run (and not too expensive to buy) , 5 door but not too large, etc. We're thinking about something like a VW golf, Audi A3 etc - What about car finance? Any suggestions or recommendations?

I bought a second-hand Skoda Fabia that was a few years old for a very reasonable price. Def not as cool a car as a VW or Audi but its v.economical to run and insure. Service costs don't look like they will be massive either. It's bigger than a VW Polo, maybe its size is on a par with a Golf.


5 doors, lots of boot space, roomy inside. Mind you, I'm a short-arse although its comfortable to drive if you're over 6 ft. So I'm told.


Don't know anything about car finance. I did loads of research before I decided upon Make/model. You could try What Car, Autotrader etc websites for comparisons too.

Buy petrol unless you are doing mainly long distance motorway miles. Better still buy a ultra low emission vehicle, EV or petrol hybrid. You wont be allowed in central London otherwise from 2020 when Boris's Ultra Low Emission Zone comes into force. Better still think about joing a car club so you only use it when you need it.


Diesel fumes are the main contributor to about 29000 early deaths in the UK due to fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide.

Ford Focus and Mazda3 are similar sized to the VW Golf, but are much more reliable.


On a more general point, seriously think about getting one of the eco versions of whatever car you decide upon.


The ones whose engines switch off when you're stationary are great. They come on again when you touch a pedal. Saves so much fuel!

I had an A3 for several years and couldnt fault it. I loved driving it - a solid, well built and pratical car. We currently have a Golf which I like, and it is a very safe car for our family to travel in, but its just not as nice inside or out as the Audi.


I recently hired a new Ford Focus which possibly drives slightly better than our Golf, but the interior felt cheaper, seats were not as comfortable etc.


If you don't care too much about what it looks or feels like or particularly how it drives, go for a cheaper option as the cars mentioned are all going to be efficient and reliable. If you are at all bothered, I think it's worth saving up for an Audi/VW as over time the things that you didn't like in the beginning will start to really annoy you later on - particularly if you do a lot of driving. Also consider the safety aspect, as cars can differ considerably on NCAP tests.

The A3 and Golf are the same car under the skin, as are the Skoda Octavia and Seat Leon. They're all built on the same platform and have identical powertrains unless you're going for a performance model.


Likewise the Mazda 3 and Ford Focus. They're the same car with different panels, trim and marketing departments.


You're already in the automotive equivalent of elasticated slacks, so I'd go full beige and get a Hyundai.


Or, if you don't mind people seeing that you've really let yourself go and stained yourself, a Kia.

Re NCAP safety tests, very little to choose from in any car in class since 2009:


http://www.euroncap.com/small_family_car.aspx


For reliability, Japanese makers consistently come out on top:


http://www.reliabilityindex.com/ratings/best/Small%20Family


Both the Golf and the A3 are great cars, but the utilitarian choice is something like a Honda Civic, and you will save yourself at least ?2k. It depends on how concerned you are with being cool.

Thanks for the helpful info, everyone. You asked whether we were bothered about the car looking cool or not- my partner's quite keen but I'm not bothered as I'm cool enough myself.


(Only joking- seriously, I'm more concerned with the finances and how much it will cost to buy/run rather than the look of it.)

David A Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> You're already in the automotive equivalent of

> elasticated slacks, so I'd go full beige and get a

> Hyundai.

>

> Or, if you don't mind people seeing that you've

> really let yourself go and stained yourself, a

> Kia.


Brilliant.

You'll generally pay less for a Golf than for an A3 with similar engine size/spec. Unless you really like the Audi brand and/or look, I'd go for a Golf instead. Only caveat is that I always think the A3 boot looks (at least from the outside) as being slightly bigger but have never properly checked it.


We had a Golf for a couple of years and it did the job very nicely although we very quickly out-grew the boot space once kids came along.

Everybody has waited 4 years and you still playing with peoples mind.Is time to make up your mind buy VW GOLF

AND END OF DISCUSSION. Wish you good luck will see what the VW God thinks about this. Should the church be involve !

smarter way of thinking using other people to make their lifes easier. I wish that happen to me.

Top Girls Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Everybody has waited 4 years and you still playing

> with peoples mind.Is time to make up your mind buy

> VW GOLF

> AND END OF DISCUSSION. Wish you good luck will see

> what the VW God thinks about this. Should the

> church be involve !

> smarter way of thinking using other people to make

> their lifes easier. I wish that happen to me.


4 years? Eh ?? November 09, is 9th November being 4 days ago not November 2009 being 4 years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...