Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our old car has conked out so we're looking for a nearly new replacement- our priorities are:- it must be economical to run (and not too expensive to buy) , 5 door but not too large, etc. We're thinking about something like a VW golf, Audi A3 etc - What about car finance? Any suggestions or recommendations?

I bought a second-hand Skoda Fabia that was a few years old for a very reasonable price. Def not as cool a car as a VW or Audi but its v.economical to run and insure. Service costs don't look like they will be massive either. It's bigger than a VW Polo, maybe its size is on a par with a Golf.


5 doors, lots of boot space, roomy inside. Mind you, I'm a short-arse although its comfortable to drive if you're over 6 ft. So I'm told.


Don't know anything about car finance. I did loads of research before I decided upon Make/model. You could try What Car, Autotrader etc websites for comparisons too.

Buy petrol unless you are doing mainly long distance motorway miles. Better still buy a ultra low emission vehicle, EV or petrol hybrid. You wont be allowed in central London otherwise from 2020 when Boris's Ultra Low Emission Zone comes into force. Better still think about joing a car club so you only use it when you need it.


Diesel fumes are the main contributor to about 29000 early deaths in the UK due to fine particulates and nitrogen dioxide.

Ford Focus and Mazda3 are similar sized to the VW Golf, but are much more reliable.


On a more general point, seriously think about getting one of the eco versions of whatever car you decide upon.


The ones whose engines switch off when you're stationary are great. They come on again when you touch a pedal. Saves so much fuel!

I had an A3 for several years and couldnt fault it. I loved driving it - a solid, well built and pratical car. We currently have a Golf which I like, and it is a very safe car for our family to travel in, but its just not as nice inside or out as the Audi.


I recently hired a new Ford Focus which possibly drives slightly better than our Golf, but the interior felt cheaper, seats were not as comfortable etc.


If you don't care too much about what it looks or feels like or particularly how it drives, go for a cheaper option as the cars mentioned are all going to be efficient and reliable. If you are at all bothered, I think it's worth saving up for an Audi/VW as over time the things that you didn't like in the beginning will start to really annoy you later on - particularly if you do a lot of driving. Also consider the safety aspect, as cars can differ considerably on NCAP tests.

The A3 and Golf are the same car under the skin, as are the Skoda Octavia and Seat Leon. They're all built on the same platform and have identical powertrains unless you're going for a performance model.


Likewise the Mazda 3 and Ford Focus. They're the same car with different panels, trim and marketing departments.


You're already in the automotive equivalent of elasticated slacks, so I'd go full beige and get a Hyundai.


Or, if you don't mind people seeing that you've really let yourself go and stained yourself, a Kia.

Re NCAP safety tests, very little to choose from in any car in class since 2009:


http://www.euroncap.com/small_family_car.aspx


For reliability, Japanese makers consistently come out on top:


http://www.reliabilityindex.com/ratings/best/Small%20Family


Both the Golf and the A3 are great cars, but the utilitarian choice is something like a Honda Civic, and you will save yourself at least ?2k. It depends on how concerned you are with being cool.

Thanks for the helpful info, everyone. You asked whether we were bothered about the car looking cool or not- my partner's quite keen but I'm not bothered as I'm cool enough myself.


(Only joking- seriously, I'm more concerned with the finances and how much it will cost to buy/run rather than the look of it.)

David A Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> You're already in the automotive equivalent of

> elasticated slacks, so I'd go full beige and get a

> Hyundai.

>

> Or, if you don't mind people seeing that you've

> really let yourself go and stained yourself, a

> Kia.


Brilliant.

You'll generally pay less for a Golf than for an A3 with similar engine size/spec. Unless you really like the Audi brand and/or look, I'd go for a Golf instead. Only caveat is that I always think the A3 boot looks (at least from the outside) as being slightly bigger but have never properly checked it.


We had a Golf for a couple of years and it did the job very nicely although we very quickly out-grew the boot space once kids came along.

Everybody has waited 4 years and you still playing with peoples mind.Is time to make up your mind buy VW GOLF

AND END OF DISCUSSION. Wish you good luck will see what the VW God thinks about this. Should the church be involve !

smarter way of thinking using other people to make their lifes easier. I wish that happen to me.

Top Girls Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Everybody has waited 4 years and you still playing

> with peoples mind.Is time to make up your mind buy

> VW GOLF

> AND END OF DISCUSSION. Wish you good luck will see

> what the VW God thinks about this. Should the

> church be involve !

> smarter way of thinking using other people to make

> their lifes easier. I wish that happen to me.


4 years? Eh ?? November 09, is 9th November being 4 days ago not November 2009 being 4 years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello. Would you like a sofa bed? We have one to give away…photos attached. The scatter cushions are not included.
    • Complaint submitted.  Your helpful link took me straight to the relevant page. 🙏
    • I spend a riddiculous amount of time at the PO.  Every day.  I watch and I watch closely.  Returns take seconds.  The wait might be long but the scan takes a second.  The only thing that slows down a return is people scrolling through their phones looking for QR codes. Business customers like me take seconds.  I might have up to 2 bags of boxes but every one is perfectly packaged and pre-paid.  It just needs a scan.  Seconds. For customers like me and for returns customers they could just put in a self-service check out and we would all be in and out in minutes.  Quicker than M&S.   Or, have a dedicated window for scanning and nothing else.  No facility to handle money at that window so nobody is tempted to ask for a service other than scanning.  That would get the queues down instantly. It is the people picking up things that backs up the queue.  The branch is not equipped to provide the service.  Next time you're in the branch take a look at the shelf space immediately behind the servers.  A few stacking shelves.  That's all the space they have.  Everything else is on the floor in a mess.  I take on board what someone said about the private delivery companies not delivering to Peckham and I didn't know that.   The biggest time wasting service of all is Parcelforce.  If someone in front of me asks for Parcelforce I want to cry.  Long, long, forms need to be filled out by hand, in triplicate.  It is Dickensian.   Please consider taking a few minutes to fill out an online complaint (link below).  I honestly believe that an influx of complaints might make a difference.  I don't want to demoralise the staff or anything sinister but the PO needs to see that the branch is broken. https://www.postoffice.co.uk/contact-us/in-branch-customer-experience    
    • Couldn't agree more with the frustration. I avoid it like the plague but made the mistake of picking up a parcel a couple of months ago and it took them 20 minutes to find it. This was after queuing for an hour. All the pickup parcels were just in a massive heap with no order or organisation so they manually had to search for everything. Bizarre and deeply annoying as if run well it could be a good asset to the Post Office and of course the community. Also, very much agree with the point re not taking it out on counter staff as it must be a terrible and demoralising environment to work in.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...