Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Professor Daniel Miller of University College London, one of the researchers working on the project, said in a blog post: ?Mostly they feel embarrassed even to be associated with it.

?This year marked the start of what looks likely to be a sustained decline of what had been the most pervasive of all social networking sites. Young people are turning away in their droves and adopting other social networks instead, while the worst people of all, their parents, continue to use the service.""


Good. I find Facebook a very useful way of keeping in touch with friends. The last thing I want is a bunch of teenagers getting hysterical, suicidal or just plain dumb all over my feed. I say let 'em bugger off.

My kids and their friends are all into Instagram and most people they know use WhatsApp.


Quite a few seem to be into Kik and WeChat too.


Facebook messenger is pants in comparison and I am an old fogey who has just gone back onto Facebook, purely to keep in touch with my family and close freinds, so seems the Torygraph is on point on this one.

The last place teenagers were all over and grown ups avoided was My Space...and we all know what happened with that.


We have an ageing population in the west with the highest share of wealth, I suspect the fact that a few spotty hormonal selfie obsessed teenagers don't think it's cool bothers Zuckenberg Zilch. Are you back Lady D? Did you miss us all?


I like Facebook for the fact that I vaguely keep up with old friends/ and remoter family that i just wouldn't without, Plus face-stalking a few exes is always fun.


I am never contraversial and avoid politics/religon etc on there.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The last place teenagers were all over and grown

> ups avoided was My Space...and we all know what

> happened with that.

>

> We have an ageing population in the west with

> the highest share of wealth, I suspect the fact

> that a few spotty hormonal selfie obsessed

> teenagers don't think it's cool bothers Zuckenberg

> Zilch. Are you back Lady D? Did you miss us all?

>

> I like Facebook for the fact that I vaguely keep

> up with old friends/ and remoter family that i

> just wouldn't without, Plus face-stalking a few

> exes is always fun.

>

> I am never contraversial and avoid

> politics/religon etc on there.



For me if I'm interested in keeping up

with someone , i will

do it via wattsapp etc . Very few of my FB friends are actual friends.

But yes the virtual stalking possibilities are a plus !

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah wattsapp is really good for keeping in touch

> .

> Did viber die the death ?


The last person to recommend viber to me was my dentist - so maybe...


I use FB for (mostly distant yet extant) friends/family and don't have any FB friends that I have never personally met - just don't go in for that side of it ("I have 6,000 FB friends!! etc.").


Find the whole 'Friend or Offend' thing - invites from those you don't want to keep up with OR snub - tricky sometimes.

Considering her job this does make me think that she was hacked, whatever, she should have been given a cghance to explain herself and apologise. It's in interesting debate though, who decides what is and isn't appropriate? We all know that what she said was unacceptable but what about freedom of speech?

I use twitter for networking and facebook for more personal stuff, I wouldn't be 'friends' with someone n fb unless I knew them in real life. And people should remember that their children are like dreams: fascinating to themselves but crashingly dull to everyone else :)

I was once called an idiot on twitter for my views on the Carl Froch & George Groves boxing match lol.

On a serious note we are held accountable for the things we say, especially when our views have the capacity to create division and potentially create enmity between groups of people. I had no idea about this incident until now. Has there been any further development in this case? An explanation maybe?

Kailyn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It always amazes me the things people post. They

> seem to go straight to facebook as soon as someone

> dies, that's just awful.


xxxxxx


I recently found out about a tragic (51 year old) Christmas Eve death via Facebook.


My initial reaction too was to find it strange that someone would choose to let people know about it in that way, but then on reflection I thought that everybody deals with things differently.


In this case the bereaved person apparently gained a lot of comfort from people's posts of condolences. And Facebook is probably the easiest way to let friends know, especially if you have a lot of friends (real friends I mean, not "Facebook only friends").


Though half past one in the morning on Boxing Day wouldn't have been my personal chosen time to do it ......

A 'friend' of mine (ex work colleague) posted two pictures of herself on FB on NYE. She asked which dress should she wear out? She had her hair arranged differently in each too. I decided to impart my view about the dress and the hair. This opinion soon got two 'likes' from her multitude of 'friends'. I was somewhat surprised to find she had hidden my post soon after.Should I unfriend her?
I've found twitter a bit more useful this Christmas as I've been able to tweet West Ham regularly asking them if they've sacked our useless twat of a manager.I've found this vaguely comforting. Still awaiting any response.....either to me personnally or him being sacked.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A 'friend' of mine (ex work colleague) posted two

> pictures of herself on FB on NYE. She asked which

> dress should she wear out? She had her hair

> arranged differently in each too. I decided to

> impart my view about the dress and the hair. This

> opinion soon got two 'likes' from her multitude of

> 'friends'. I was somewhat surprised to find she

> had hidden my post soon after.Should I unfriend

> her?


xxxxx


:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • True.  And I'll have a look online. Thank you for the explanation. I have just googled, and that is indeed the case with certain weeds. I had no idea that this could happen, so thank you.     The below is apparently all Southwark Council has to say. They don't say why they remove weeds, just that they do, and how. They've got a lot more to say about Japanese Knotweed, which does indeed cause problems, but which they don't remove! However I've never noticed any round here.  
    • It's probably less of a priority for them than it appears to be for the OP! Nobody is saying that local businesses are not part of the community. But in the context of this thread, there is a clear distinction between local businesses set up to make a profit for individuals and local non profit organisations set up to help groups and individuals in the community. What has living in social housing got to do with anything? And who is forcing anybody to "accept a secondary definition" or telling anybody to "shut up"?
    • Whilst I agree this is unlikely to be some plot, individual drivers may not have evidence of the time parking suspension notices were put up.
    • Were you affected or are you fighting the battle of others?  If penalties are wrongly given then the owners will surely have appropriate evidence to appeal.  And if this is a systematic error then it will not continue.  I doubt if there are masterminds plotting this.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...