Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm planning to buy a new HD TV. I haven't decided which one yet but have a question that I'm sure someone can help with. When HD is eventually transmitted over Freeview (not currently possible due to bandwith issues) will HD TV's with an integrated digital Freeview tuner be capable of processing this or will a separate box be required ? It seems that the requirements for an "HD Ready" logo only apply to the display and not the TV's tuner. If the tuner is capable of processing the HD signal then the TV may have the "HDTV" logo as well. I can't find any TV's that have HDTV Freeview tuners - presumably because until HD is transmitted over Freeview there is no demand. I am aware that Panasonic have released HDTV's with intregrated FreeSat tuners which enables one to receive HD with no subscription, if you have, or want, a dish.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3974-hd-ready-vs-hd-tv-question/
Share on other sites

From what I have read HD on freeview will require a different type of freeview tuner, whether it's built in to the TV or not. if your HD ready TV has built in tuner you still have the option to plug in a new tuner box (providing you can cable between the two.

Hi E-P,

i was a TV buyer until recently, when HD is transmitted over freeview from 2012 it will require 4 freeview channels to be taken off the air for every 1 HD. There are currently just 4 Freeview HD channels planned. 2 BBC, 1 ITV and 1 other for open market pitch 9highest bidder).


Freeview HD will never be able to carry anything like the amount of HD channels Freesat HD/ sky hd due to frequency width restrictions.


as you say you will also need a new tuner as it will be transmitted in a different formet (mpeg4 i think).


Some Tv s currently offer integrated freesat tuners (eg panasonic) but it is much cheaper to buy the version without integrated tuner and buy the tuner box separately.



HD ready tvs with tv tuners in (freeview) cannot show the hd freeview (2012...) but im sure there will be some available soon as the government only decided to do freview HD last month.



HD TVs also upscale standard definition pictures, which does improve standard definition pictures.


HD is not a noticable improvement on SD screens unless the screen is above 32"



technology always changes so i dont think the customer has the right to feel aggrieved that new better standards are adopted when they a become available..


have funn!B) (&excuse all the type-o's)

I can understand why you stopped buying TVs! Way too much complication.

Very grateful for all your explanation though.


Freeeview and TopUpTV drives me nuts, and Sky is out the question, Virgin Media MAYBE, but not heard anyone talk about BT Vision 'cept that nice man off the telly wot used to be in MyFamily.


Sooooooooo BT Vision anybody?

I'd also recommend a trip to avforums.com, where if you ask questions that havent been asked before and arent something you could very easily find on google, are extremely helpful (and knowledgable)


Sometimes HD can really improve the quality of the program. 2 examples for me recently have been the lost land of the jaguar on the BBC which looks amazing, the other is "in the valley of elah" where there's one shot about half way through with Tommy Lee Jones and you get a side on shot of him at the wheel and the detail you can see in his face of all his lines really enhances how the world is against him at that moment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Saw the aftermath of another phone theft on east dulwich grove by trio last night. Then half an hour later spotted them biking back to 'work'. Crazy the police can't do anything about this - they are clearly cruising the same streets. 
    • Alas, poor Toadflax!  And gentle Alkanet.
    • Generally wild flowers which are indigenous to the UK are more likely to be supporting more wild life than introduced species, more commonly found in gardens, simply because wild life hasn't had time to adapt to it. Although of course many introductions which flower will be supporting pollinators more generally. (This would also be true of native as opposed to introduced tree and scrub species). And I suspect plants which are flowering over public space, even if rooted on private private, are being removed to stop them setting seed in public space. [Although many might see that as a good thing if the plants have merits of their own).
    • Good question. I think the benefit of some wild flowers is that they appear earlier in the spring and provide nectar for insects coming out of hibernation. Also, natives have evolved with the insects, some of which can only survive with certain native plants. For example, some species of  caterpillars need a specific native plant for their food. Having said that, I've seen lots of pollinators having a field day on some non native flowers. My bees love my verbena bonariensis for example.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...