Jump to content

Recommended Posts

definition of crass: "adjective - showing no sensitivity"

I submit "If you don't like my comparison with cancer research, then tough." as evidence m'lud


Definition of explanation: "noun - a statement or account that makes something clear"


I submit "If those events are subsequently (even many years later) shown to have had a cause which was not "supernatural", that has no bearing whatsoever on any other unrelated event." as evidence m'lud.


Advice, stop digging.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> definition of crass: "adjective - showing no

> sensitivity"

> I submit "If you don't like my comparison with

> cancer research, then tough." as evidence m'lud

>

> Definition of explanation: "noun - a statement or

> account that makes something clear"

>

> I submit "If those events are subsequently (even

> many years later) shown to have had a cause which

> was not "supernatural", that has no bearing

> whatsoever on any other unrelated event." as

> evidence m'lud.

>

> Advice, stop digging.


xxxxxxx


Yes - that would be my advice to you.


Plus to learn some elementary logic and then to apply it to what you write on here.

a) Some academic research into the subject has (and possibly still is) looking for evidence other than anecdotal.


b) El Pibe's argument:


Event x was thought by a person who experienced it to be paranormal. It was subsequently shown not to be.


Therefore events y and z, also thought by those who experienced them to be paranormal, WILL ALSO subsequently be shown not to be.


Fatal logical flaw.


ETA: And I'm sick of being patronised on here.I have done postgrad research and I'm not stupid.

Back on topic. Has anyone ever heard the story of the haunted boating lake area in Dulwich Park? Numerous people have mentioned seeing a lady in Victorian clothing walking around the boating lake very early in the mornings. Are there any people locally who have witnessed/heard of other peoples accounts on this particular ALLEGED (for the pedants on here) haunting?


Louisa.

I think we can all agree that there has been academic research on the subject, which has yielded no positive results. I think we can also agree that El Pibe's argument, if it were intended to disprove all paranormal observations (which it wasn't), would constitute a faulty generalisation.


We're still left with anecdotes vs grounded cynicism...

No love. I've made my arguments quite clear.

That was a hypothetical situation representative of the logic involved.


There is no evidence of supernatural (ghosts, goblins, gods) phenomena.

There is no evidence of paranormal (telekinesis, telepathy, prescience) phenomena.


Therefore any "explanations" of experiences are conjecture, based upon personal feelings and beliefs.


Until anyone provides a shred of evidence then I'll assume the real explanations of any experience to be mundane, based upon physical (or psychogical) reasons.


Take my ghost. I could have said "I know what I've seen and you're all close minded" but my instinct was to question my sanity.

Eventually it was explained perfectly well as as an acute sleep disorder. Bob's your uncle.


Again, until a fact is produced in support you've only your own logical fallacies, and complaints about personal insults (there were none) to fall back on.


So waiting, facts...

Dear Sue,


I posted again because some post were very eccentric. Being insulted by some one who thinks as you do is quite a compliment.


Cheers.








Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chick Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This whole thread is barking.

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Charming as always.

>

> Closed-minded as always.

>

> Prejudiced as always.

>

> :(

>

> ETA: Guess you had to have another dig as nobody

> bothered to comment on your station "joke" on the

> first page?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...