Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The op said this government's policies- in fact most of the problems we have are a result of the previous government's rubbish policies- allowing the proliferation of gambling opportunities (Tessa Jowell) means people have less money to spend on other things. Labour allowed the banks to do what they liked (Gordon Brown gave the Bank of England a free hand). It was Labour that allowed central government to override local government planning issues (John Prescott). Energy prices have been high since before this government due to green taxes.

Well we all know about stats and lies.

ZHC lets see - never know if you will have work so how can anyone plan for bills, shopping etc. Do not have the same employment rights as other employees. Can be given work or be sent home at a whim of boss. No job security. Etc. It's still not why shop shut.

Not everyone at every stage of their life seek security and some quite happy with flexibility.....not saying these are all willingly entered into, universally liked or never abused but they DO suit some people. Read the research not the propoganda....
I know several people that have zero hour contracts willingly as it allows them to pick up casual shifts at various workplaces without having the hassle of having to submit personal tax returns as their work goes through the books and PAYE. Whilst not the case for everyone, the benefits of zero hour contract for SOME is hardly propaganda.
I line manage 30 people who are on zero hour contracts. I have been looking in to getting them a better deal, but about 4 of them have actually said to me they like things as they are, because although they don't get sickness/holiday pay (actually their hourly rate does incorporate a holiday premium, so it's not actually correct to say they don't get paid holiday), they like that they can basically choose when they want to go away, and tell me they're not available for work.

Zero-hour contracts can be very good for those at the higher end of the skill spectrum, they allow flexible working and portfolio of jobs. Often they are used to allow what are, in effect, call-off contracts for individuals, without the need to go through tendering processes and recruitment every time.


They are bad for low-paid workers where the flexibility is all the employers, where the employer requires exclusivity and where e.g. only on-site but not travel between jobs time is paid for.

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I expect the Police just needed some new

> Nickers.

>

> That joke is so bad you should be under a vest for





> it.


I repeat...La Avril is NOT the knicker shop...the knicker shop is called Bloomers and is next door!

Think it is probably very important for Bloomers (a great lingerie shop) not to be confused for a shop (La Avril) that such rumours are circulating about. I for one was beginning to wonder if it was closed, not great for business.


Think that is why new wave is making the point.

Cora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think it is probably very important for Bloomers

> (a great lingerie shop) not to be confused for a

> shop (La Avril) that such rumours are circulating

> about. I for one was beginning to wonder if it was

> closed, not great for business.

>

> Think that is why new wave is making the point.


THANK-YOU Cora...That is EXACTLY why I was making a point of telling people to stop pointing fingers at the wrong business.

God knows its hard enough for small independent shops not on the 'main drag' without people assuming they've closed doen.

Mike Dodd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thought we are talking about a small shop having

> finacial problems not zero contracts or have I

> missed something ???


No, just the usual suspects thread-jacking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax?  Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT). 
    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...