Jump to content

The best mobile phone coverage


Poppins

Recommended Posts

Sorry to hijack this thread - just wanted to know how EE reception is as well in the area - trying to decide between O2 and EE.


Just a point to note - ED/Peckham Rye seems to have abysmal coverage in certain areas (eg: Nutbrook St, Bellenden Road, some areas of LL) compared to others. Similar gap in service between Brockley and New Cross Gate. Maybe a problem of missing cell towers rather than any particular provider?

devsdev Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to hijack this thread - just wanted to know

> how EE reception is as well in the area - trying

> to decide between O2 and EE.

>


xxxxxx


I have EE (ex Orange) - the only place I've had a problem with round here is the top of Melford Road. But other providers' reception is also bad round there.

O2 is good. Mrs switched from Vodafone who were a bit patchy in ED. WRT 4G - Pretty much 4G wherever I go in London on O2. And it's really really fast. Their 4G network outside of London isn't as extensive as EEs - according to the maps I looked at when I was deciding who to go with. So if you travel a lot in the UK you might want to look at EE. If you don;t travel much out of London though O2 might be better - they were much cheaper for 4G than EE when I looked - but of course that might be different now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...