Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i've booked a holiday in term time to celebrate being 5 years cancer free - next month is when i'll get all-clear. as you can imagine, we've been through the mill the past few years, and this is a major milestone as reaching the 5 year point dramatically reduces the odds of it coming back.


I wrote last week to my head to ask for authorised leave as extraordinary circumstances - not heard back yet - just wondered if i was right in thinking these were exceptional circumstances? Can't find anything on net about what are exceptional circumstances. I've said we don't plan to take her out again. If it's at head's discretion - does this sound a reasonable request? I appreciate it's all about me rather than my daughter but she's not been immune to the stress of the past 5 years - we've all been through this together.


susypx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40305-term-time-holiday/
Share on other sites

Oh congratulations! To me that sounds like an exceptional circumstance and one to be celebrated with the people who were by your side.


I have no experience of asking for term time holidays and I don't work in a school so have no useful advice to offer, I'm afraid. Here's a link to a recent BBC new story http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-25733272 which I hope doesn't happen to you, as I think that would be pretty unreasonable.


Enjoy your time together!

I believe the law has just changed and I suspect you wouldn't qualify under the new terms. 'Exceptional', I think, would cover things like funerals, emergencies, etc, not events of (in your case massive) personal significance.


What *some people* do in your situation is find that their child comes down with a tummy bug.


I hope you find a solution and congratulations on your five-year anniversary!

Yes I saw that story which is why i am a bit concerned. except what i think happened is that they didn't pay the fine on principle and so were taken to court. I've already asked for the leave so can't go down the tummy bug route, although surely this legislation is just leading people to do this! anyway, just trying to work out if i get fined, whether to make it a big deal etc or just accept that's the way it works. Although, from what i can work out, the head refers you to the authorities to get fined so the head could just say no and leave it at that. In the end i suspect making a big fuss would only affect my daughter negatively and it would probably just be most sensible to accept it - even if it seems unfair?


cheers


Susypx

Such good news and a really lovely idea to celebrate!


Whilst on a personal level the Head may well agree with you s/he is constrained by the rules. It also depends on the absence figures for the school in general. You might just get a letter back saying the absence is not authorised but that they have noted it, ie they will not expect your child to be there on those days.

SE22mum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Such good news and a really lovely idea to

> celebrate!

>

> Whilst on a personal level the Head may well agree

> with you s/he is constrained by the rules.


Yes, but, isn't that precisely susyp's point? What are the 'rules'? What is an 'extraordinary circumstance'? Isn't it still at the discretion of the head to make that decision, or is there now a standardised protocol for headteachers to decide what qualifies as 'extraordinary'???

Yes, that's what one would assume and hope would be the case! But talking to teacher friends of mine it seems that some schools and Heads are under pressure to make sure their attendance records do not slip and so have to be very strict in what qualifies as "extraordinary". But what they can do sometimes is not give permission but then not do anything when you do take your child out of school anyway.


I agree that a higher level of discretion would be best...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a huge part of the problem.   Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country.    There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.
    • I heard today there was a burglary in Lacon Road yesterday evening between 20.00 - 22.00,  apparently the owners were home at the time & thieves got away with electrical items along with the owners car!  Wtf!   Anyone heard anything else?
    • What standing on the world stage? Starmer is a wannebe leader, no charisma, no passion, no leadership but tonnes of dithering, wringing his hands and pooing his pants.  I'd love to see Burnham give him a run for his money. Reason he became Mayor of Manchester was due to him no longer wanting to be in front line politics.  This thread has now gone well off topic, perhaps it needs renaming. Mandy and Keith's bathrobe Or, how Mandy stuck it to Starmer
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...