Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely a line is better than xxxxx, as those

> indicate crossing out.


xxxxxxx


But you wouldn't delete something online with crosses, unless you somehow put the crosses over the top of what you'd deleted because you wanted it still to be seen?


You'd delete with the delete key leaving no trace, surely?


Anyway, I've no idea how to insert a line into a post!


Perhaps I will try using different symbols - probably not though :)


EPB, :)) :)) :))

entirely up to you Sue, but sometimes thos x's come across really strangely if the tone of a discussion is less than cuddly


if it was me (and few people seem to need to do this) then any of the following would be better suited



-----------------------------------------------------


************************************


_______________________________________

You can distinguish your writing from the lines you are quoting by putting these (the quotes) in italics - you write (then the text quoted) (leaving out the spaces inside the ) - putting something in bold - substitute 'b' for 'i'.


That way you don't need to put lines between the quote and your response. It also allows you more easily to write: Quote; Commentary; Second quote; Second commentary and so on.


Edited to format as I suggested

I would have thought that the standard etiquette of the greater than


> quoted stuff


should suffice.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Quoted_line_prefix


or of course the quoteblock


i've been reading sue's posts for ages and i still get confused thinking she's being very affectionate

I saw a mini-plague (in the absence of any other collective noun!) of rats from the boardwalk last week.


There used to be loads round the ponds in Brockwell Park. Making ducks ill be throwing tons of white bread at them is the problem.


In Brockwell Park they poisoned them - and several dogs and crows died too.


The dog deaths were 'unexplained'. But small terrier type dogs dying at the same time as a mass rat-poisoning exercise?


Educating folk about feeding ducks is the better way of managing rats.

I'm quite bemused by the sudden interest in the way I write my posts, but hey ho.


Thanks for all the suggestions, but I'm not about to change! Most people appear not be confused, as this is the first time it has ever been mentioned, on this or other forums :)


I'm even more bemused that some people appear to think a row of xs to show where my own post starts should demonstrate affection!


Anyway, back to the rats. I agree there should be more education re feeding bread to ducks, but what you can do? There are already notices up. Maybe the cafe could sell more suitable food for ducks?


Personally I'm more concerned for the health of the ducks than the fact that rats are attracted. But then I like rats :)

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always thought you were indicating "sarcastic"

> affection, Sue

>

> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Maybe you should read my posts more carefully, then, as I'm rarely sarcastic, in inverted commas or otherwise :)


Not sure why this sudden interest in the way I write my posts, however.

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having read your post carefully ............

>

> I always thought this was one of those rare

> occasions when you were indicating "sarcastic"

> affection, Sue.

>

> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Eh?


How do you make that out?


What is your definition of "sarcastic", then, because it's clearly different from mine!


And why don't you just leave me alone when this is supposed to be a thread about rats in Dulwich Park?


All the xxx s in the last three posts have been yours.


If you want to continue to have a go at me, why not start a new anti-Sue thread in the lounge? Provided of course this thread hasn't already ended up there :(

When we moved, we discovered we had a feral dog padding around our land. She went and had six puppies and increasing amounts of poop meant we got the local SPCA to catch them all and get them proper homes.


Now we have rats, so I guess I know why the pups looked so well fed.


Aaaanyway, long story short, to reiterate civilservant's question, given that the lack of urban waste, toxins etc, are clean rats still disease bearing or are they no more troublesome than squirrels (rats with good PR)?

Nicoledulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rats do live in nice big lush spaces too and

> Dulwich park is one such place...shouldn't be a

> problem unless there are too many one day. Just

> part of life and nothing to worry about.


xxxxxx


Completely agree!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...