Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wow. A new school with even less space than Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets to take over yet more education. Really quite sad about this.

Hi LondonMix,

We always said we wanted two. Sufficient parental support for two. One for East Dulwich and one targetted at Nunhead/Peckham Rye. Suspect the site they'll find will be in East Dulwich. Saldly this hasnt been a cross-part campaign. Southwark Labour have been indifferent and blanked all our requests to join in and lead with us. But at least council officials are including all these free schools in their admissions plans.

The reception school crisis is forecast to reach its worst by Stepmber 2016 with a gap of 215-235 reception places. Judith Kerr helps with 50 places (originally they were destined for Lambeth or Rotherhithe so delighted we found a local site for them), each Harris primary school provides 60 places per year, a few school expansions such as Bessemer adding 30, Belham releivng Goose Green of 30 reception places.

The obvious next problem is then secondary school places.


Hi daveybigpotatoes,

When we started this campaign two years ago we approahc a nmber of school providers. Harris came up trumps - other didnt. More recently others have shown as interest such as Dulwich Hamlet and we will continue to offer advice and support. The next big problem will be providing sufficient secondary school places. Southwark Council deny any requirement providing sufficient places for Dulwich children in Walworth, Aylesbury, Catford, New Cross.


Hi katgod,

I'm sorry it's made you feel sad.

I'd feel even sadder without the ultimate 420 children having local school places.

If you have an alternative site in mind please let us know. We think we've looked at everything in detail.

So the key will be in the design of the school and clever timetabling.

I honestly assumed that it was going to be one site and that the plan was the East Dulwich Hospital site .

Two different Harris Primaries in East Dulwich is not something I would lend my support to .

katgod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow. A new school with even less space than

> Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on

> since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about

> space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets

> to take over yet more education. Really quite sad

> about this.


Foxy was the first to express the unsuitability of this site for a school and got knocked back. Nothing new there.


In an age of increasing Childhood Obesity, certain vote seeking councillors seem to be in favour of building

a school with very little exercise space.


Exercise is as essential as any academic requirement.

In fact exercise has been proven to improve academic achievement.


Not a case of NIMBYism as someone suggested..


Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles. Allowing a Commercial Giant to take over every

Educational Establishment, while other school can't find the money to buy Books.


Losing the will to live..


DulwichFox

It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to find a site with large open spaces for children to play and do PE. The hospital site would have been good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So what are the realistic alternatives?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to

> find a site with large open spaces for children to

> play and do PE. The hospital site would have been

> good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So

> what are the realistic alternatives?



Agree. That would of been a much better site..


There are no realistic alternatives.. sadly. but making do really is not good enough.


DulwichFox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles.


xxxxxx


Fox, the totem pole came out of a completely different budget - Cleaner, Greener, Safer.


The council can't use that money to fund a school.


And many people including me think it was absolutely fine to spend a relatively small amount of money on something which will really cheer up the area.

Yes Sue it's a different budget.


But .. The council has a certain amount of money and THEY decide how much money goes to each budget.


SO.. More money for schools .. Less for Totem Poles.


I have to budget my money.


No good telling the Council I cant pay my Council Tax because all my money goes into my Beer Budget.


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you still moaning foxy? Do you have kids of

> primary age? If not, let it go man, you'll put

> yourself in an early grave with all this worrying

> about the poor mites breathing in recycled air.


I'm not moaning.. Please get off that band wagon . Just expressing my concern.


I have never been involved with anything purely out of self interest.


Early Grave.. ? At my age , I'm already on borrowed time.. :) Many of my old mates have already slipped away.


Live long.. Beer... Curry... Kebabs...


Foxy.

Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem absolutely determined to be negative on this thread.


I don't think this is an ideal site for a school, but a school is required, and there's not really anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do. There are other areas that they could concentrate on to make up for any failings of the site... Like the actual teaching and education of the children.

Hi DulwichFox,

I'm pretty certain the new school will have a regular playground and the kids will run around playing pretty much the same games I did as a kid.

The key is in clever site design and agreeing time at swimming pools and the like.


But yes if we had the option in East Dulwich of playing fields that would of course be a better alternative. Sadly we don't. Equally we can;t expand the site by buying adjacent properties. Apart from them being homes it would cost too much.


When the East Dulwich Harris Boys Academy was being planned it was descirbed by some as a Sardine Academy. They get around this by having a good sports hall, booking sessions at sports grounds. But they also go on one week sailing courses and physical activities like that. I suspect the older primary school years will get similar opportunities.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> absolutely determined to be negative on this

> thread.

>

I don't think this is an ideal site for a school,

> but a school is required, and there's not really

> anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do.

> There are other areas that they could concentrate

> on to make up for any failings of the site... Like

> the actual teaching and education of the children.


Initially all I said was.


Considering the amount of traffic and the amount of accidents along

that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a more inappropriate site for a school.



Any Further comments came about from having to defend myself and views from a tirade of insults aimed at Foxy.


I really don't give a damn what they build there.. Open Prison if they want...

No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

Get my point. ?


DF.

This might seem a stupid question but could the old Thomas Calton School at Choumert RD be re used, I think is is now used for adult education could this be moved to the smaller Police station site and the old TC site re built to a new larger grand big new school.

Bob S

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> > absolutely determined to be negative on this

> > thread.

> >

> I don't think this is an ideal site for a

> school,

> > but a school is required, and there's not

> really

> > anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make

> do.

> > There are other areas that they could

> concentrate

> > on to make up for any failings of the site...

> Like

> > the actual teaching and education of the

> children.

>

> Initially all I said was.

>

> Considering the amount of traffic and the amount

> of accidents along

> that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a

> more inappropriate site for a school.

>

>

> Any Further comments came about from having to

> defend myself and views from a tirade of insults

> aimed at Foxy.

>

> I really don't give a damn what they build there..

> Open Prison if they want...

> No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise

> space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

> Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

> Get my point. ?

>

> DF.



No.


Most prisoners can not be taken off site. School kids can go to local facilities.


I went to St John's when it was on Northcross / Archdale, and that was small with a little playground. We went to Dulwich baths, Crystal Palace sports centre, Peckham Rye (this was in the 80s). Talking about the kid's human rights because there won't be a massive playground is over extending.

what on earth does 'Harris came up trumps' actually mean James. My question was why have they been selected. Your answer that they won because they won isn't great. Presumably you set the policy, the selection criteria, run the selection process etc. pleas answer the question. Why is there no new Southwark BC school? Does Harris support the political parties?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Fair points, not arguing with you on them.  What people forget is that immigrants or low skilled workers do the jobs the home population don't want to do and without those jobs being done, things very quickly grind to a halt, i.e. hospital cleaners, all very necessary, but I'd have thought the majority are on minimum wage. And Minimum Wage (35hrs/wk) isn't exactly what I'd call minimum. Just over £21K, easily double and a bit more than what I get in monthly pension income to live off.
    • Well he couldn’t deliver anything better than a poor brexit. Because no such thing exists 
    • Fair points jazzer. But it begs the question, on what information are people basing their opinion? because if it’s x or the right wing media the of course they will believe nothing has happened but people who claim to be motivated by rising immigration numbers are either ignorant of or don’t care the those numbers have dropped significantly since Labour got in Hospital waiting lists are finally showing improvements after years of getting worse people on minimum wage are better off We haven’t had a random general election or new prime minister just months after the last one  compare that to Tory chaos Important relations with other countries (important for long term trade and growth) have improved under labour given the size of the mess they inherited it’s far better than many give credit for  and the prospect of a Badenoch and/or farage govt returning us to the chaos of last 10 years? No thanks (I could do a long list of things Labour have done wrong or badly but that’s for another thread. I did not vote for Labour, but all things considered they are a massive improvement on what came before. Unfortunately we have a bunch of far right agitators kicking off around the country because they are cry babies which gives impression country is going downhill  when it’s really not)  
    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...