Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wow. A new school with even less space than Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets to take over yet more education. Really quite sad about this.

Hi LondonMix,

We always said we wanted two. Sufficient parental support for two. One for East Dulwich and one targetted at Nunhead/Peckham Rye. Suspect the site they'll find will be in East Dulwich. Saldly this hasnt been a cross-part campaign. Southwark Labour have been indifferent and blanked all our requests to join in and lead with us. But at least council officials are including all these free schools in their admissions plans.

The reception school crisis is forecast to reach its worst by Stepmber 2016 with a gap of 215-235 reception places. Judith Kerr helps with 50 places (originally they were destined for Lambeth or Rotherhithe so delighted we found a local site for them), each Harris primary school provides 60 places per year, a few school expansions such as Bessemer adding 30, Belham releivng Goose Green of 30 reception places.

The obvious next problem is then secondary school places.


Hi daveybigpotatoes,

When we started this campaign two years ago we approahc a nmber of school providers. Harris came up trumps - other didnt. More recently others have shown as interest such as Dulwich Hamlet and we will continue to offer advice and support. The next big problem will be providing sufficient secondary school places. Southwark Council deny any requirement providing sufficient places for Dulwich children in Walworth, Aylesbury, Catford, New Cross.


Hi katgod,

I'm sorry it's made you feel sad.

I'd feel even sadder without the ultimate 420 children having local school places.

If you have an alternative site in mind please let us know. We think we've looked at everything in detail.

So the key will be in the design of the school and clever timetabling.

I honestly assumed that it was going to be one site and that the plan was the East Dulwich Hospital site .

Two different Harris Primaries in East Dulwich is not something I would lend my support to .

katgod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow. A new school with even less space than

> Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on

> since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about

> space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets

> to take over yet more education. Really quite sad

> about this.


Foxy was the first to express the unsuitability of this site for a school and got knocked back. Nothing new there.


In an age of increasing Childhood Obesity, certain vote seeking councillors seem to be in favour of building

a school with very little exercise space.


Exercise is as essential as any academic requirement.

In fact exercise has been proven to improve academic achievement.


Not a case of NIMBYism as someone suggested..


Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles. Allowing a Commercial Giant to take over every

Educational Establishment, while other school can't find the money to buy Books.


Losing the will to live..


DulwichFox

It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to find a site with large open spaces for children to play and do PE. The hospital site would have been good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So what are the realistic alternatives?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to

> find a site with large open spaces for children to

> play and do PE. The hospital site would have been

> good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So

> what are the realistic alternatives?



Agree. That would of been a much better site..


There are no realistic alternatives.. sadly. but making do really is not good enough.


DulwichFox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles.


xxxxxx


Fox, the totem pole came out of a completely different budget - Cleaner, Greener, Safer.


The council can't use that money to fund a school.


And many people including me think it was absolutely fine to spend a relatively small amount of money on something which will really cheer up the area.

Yes Sue it's a different budget.


But .. The council has a certain amount of money and THEY decide how much money goes to each budget.


SO.. More money for schools .. Less for Totem Poles.


I have to budget my money.


No good telling the Council I cant pay my Council Tax because all my money goes into my Beer Budget.


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you still moaning foxy? Do you have kids of

> primary age? If not, let it go man, you'll put

> yourself in an early grave with all this worrying

> about the poor mites breathing in recycled air.


I'm not moaning.. Please get off that band wagon . Just expressing my concern.


I have never been involved with anything purely out of self interest.


Early Grave.. ? At my age , I'm already on borrowed time.. :) Many of my old mates have already slipped away.


Live long.. Beer... Curry... Kebabs...


Foxy.

Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem absolutely determined to be negative on this thread.


I don't think this is an ideal site for a school, but a school is required, and there's not really anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do. There are other areas that they could concentrate on to make up for any failings of the site... Like the actual teaching and education of the children.

Hi DulwichFox,

I'm pretty certain the new school will have a regular playground and the kids will run around playing pretty much the same games I did as a kid.

The key is in clever site design and agreeing time at swimming pools and the like.


But yes if we had the option in East Dulwich of playing fields that would of course be a better alternative. Sadly we don't. Equally we can;t expand the site by buying adjacent properties. Apart from them being homes it would cost too much.


When the East Dulwich Harris Boys Academy was being planned it was descirbed by some as a Sardine Academy. They get around this by having a good sports hall, booking sessions at sports grounds. But they also go on one week sailing courses and physical activities like that. I suspect the older primary school years will get similar opportunities.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> absolutely determined to be negative on this

> thread.

>

I don't think this is an ideal site for a school,

> but a school is required, and there's not really

> anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do.

> There are other areas that they could concentrate

> on to make up for any failings of the site... Like

> the actual teaching and education of the children.


Initially all I said was.


Considering the amount of traffic and the amount of accidents along

that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a more inappropriate site for a school.



Any Further comments came about from having to defend myself and views from a tirade of insults aimed at Foxy.


I really don't give a damn what they build there.. Open Prison if they want...

No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

Get my point. ?


DF.

This might seem a stupid question but could the old Thomas Calton School at Choumert RD be re used, I think is is now used for adult education could this be moved to the smaller Police station site and the old TC site re built to a new larger grand big new school.

Bob S

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> > absolutely determined to be negative on this

> > thread.

> >

> I don't think this is an ideal site for a

> school,

> > but a school is required, and there's not

> really

> > anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make

> do.

> > There are other areas that they could

> concentrate

> > on to make up for any failings of the site...

> Like

> > the actual teaching and education of the

> children.

>

> Initially all I said was.

>

> Considering the amount of traffic and the amount

> of accidents along

> that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a

> more inappropriate site for a school.

>

>

> Any Further comments came about from having to

> defend myself and views from a tirade of insults

> aimed at Foxy.

>

> I really don't give a damn what they build there..

> Open Prison if they want...

> No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise

> space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

> Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

> Get my point. ?

>

> DF.



No.


Most prisoners can not be taken off site. School kids can go to local facilities.


I went to St John's when it was on Northcross / Archdale, and that was small with a little playground. We went to Dulwich baths, Crystal Palace sports centre, Peckham Rye (this was in the 80s). Talking about the kid's human rights because there won't be a massive playground is over extending.

what on earth does 'Harris came up trumps' actually mean James. My question was why have they been selected. Your answer that they won because they won isn't great. Presumably you set the policy, the selection criteria, run the selection process etc. pleas answer the question. Why is there no new Southwark BC school? Does Harris support the political parties?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...