Jump to content

Maybe we shouldn't wish for a Waitrose in place of our Somerfield...


Recommended Posts

Natalious13 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yep coop bought somerfield but they won't keep all

> the sites which means there's still hope for a

> waitrose! but hey i'll settle for a co-op over

> somerfield any day.


xxxxx


Me too, whether Co-op or Waitrose, has to be better than Somerfield - both good, in different ways.


Is my grammar right there? I fear not :)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yes, but people go to Waitrose 'cos of its

> poncey brand rather than any quality issue. The

> woman all think they're doing what Nigella does

> and their husbands hope they're going to bump into

> her


Bit of a generalisation I think. Before I lived in my old house I always used Sainsbury's because I thought the frsh stuff was nicer quality than Tesco, but the choice of supermarkets in my small town was limited to Waitrose or Lidl, and so I did use Waitrose and it was nicer quality than Sainsbury's. Customer service was generally better too. I don't watch Nigella on the TV, and I didn't know she shopped in Waitrose either. So now I use Ocado, which is also the best delivery service from what I can make out.

Shopping in Waitrose is almost a pleasant experience - no matter what you think ???? - the choice is superior to any of the other supermarkets, and their own brand is priced on a par with others, and their wine selection is wider and more interesting than others.
when did dulwich become the new chelsea, its unrecognizable what with all these poncy shops and bars. but i do think sommerfeilds should be replaced because its defiantly not in keeping with the surroundings. i thought we were getting a marks and sparks food hall instead we got white stuff......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
    • Worth calling ahead as sometimes they can’t accept large donations
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...