Jump to content

London Crime Maps

Vickster

By Vickster
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Vickster

Vickster

Posted
Posted

Quite reassuring to see that crime in ED is generally average compared to the general rating for Southwark which is above average. That is until you look at the figures. 2 crimes (burglary, robbery and car related crime) in each of June and July. Seems unlikely, as I think more crimes than that have been discussed on this forum alone!


Also strange that the area around East Dulwich Grove is above average.




BBC Article on Crime Maps

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4109-london-crime-maps/
Share on other sites
Only me!

Only me!

Posted
Posted

There was an interesting piece about these maps on R4 the other day.

How they are OK to give a background guide to an area

but pointing out that the way they are compiled unfortunately builds in some anomalies.

For instance every Police Station (& it's postcode) will show as a Crime spike.

Simply because multiple crimes are reported there & it's the Postcode where the crime is reported that goes into the figures.

SeanMacGabhann

SeanMacGabhann

Posted
Posted

that number is not the number of crimes committed


"When looking at larger areas of London, for example at a borough level, the specific crime rate is shown as a rate of that crime per 1,000 head of population during the specific reporting period. Where possible, the actual crime numbers are shown so that a user can see how many crimes of that type have been recorded in the area of London they are interested in. It should be noted that where the occurrence of a crime type is particularly low and there is a risk of identifying an individual, the MPS is not permitted to display actual numbers."


Add to that fact that it's reported crime and not every criminal act (how could it be?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • AylwardS
      ED Nature Watch

      By AylwardS · Posted

      Bumpkin I’d say feed and clean.    The RSPB say garden birds are low risk for avian flu but take precautions and clean feeders and birdbaths regularly.    Birds will be starting to nest soon and food you put out can at least feed the parents so they can feed live food to the young who can’t take seed yet.    It’s reccomended to wear gloves and clean feeders/birdbaths with mild disinfectant weekly. 
    • HeadNun
      Aroma Lab

      By HeadNun · Posted

      We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • Moovart
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Moovart · Posted

      I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...