Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry to be SO dull?


..But we're considering moving and have found the info that the last place offered at Goodrich last year was 460m, does anyone know if this was in the first round of offers, or was this the furthest distance that a child eventually got in from on the waiting list even after the shake down etc?


thanks for any help!


I can feel my blood pressure rising even having to think about this..gah.

Yes, this distance based on first round offers. I suspect it was my next door but one neighbour in fact. Completely unscientifically, I am expecting Goodrich catchment to be slightly bigger this year, as they bulged a while back and I think last year and the year before would have borne the brunt of a higher number of places going to siblings.
Yes, think that may have been us! But others further away got offered places later on (not many though, from what I've heard). I'd have thought with the new school (s?) opening this year may not be as crazy as last year?
Have those that are offered places so close to the start of term, or even after, been offered place elsewhere in the first round that they have rejected? If not, it must be pretty stressful waiting for a place to come up so close to the start of term & even worse if the term has already started.

thanks for info, do others reckon Norfolkvillas is right in thinking catchment may expand for Sept '15 a bit due to it having been a couple of years since bulge (is that right it's been a couple of years?)

I assume goodrich isn't bulging this year??? gawd.

simonethebeaver, how does a kid start as first in waiting list and then go down to tenth?? forgive all the questions!

Belle, what's the furthest road you know of where a kid got in? thanks!

Goodrich bulged 5 years ago - daughter is in bulge year which is now year 4. Don't know if they're bulging this year - haven't heard anything yet but it's usually not down to the school but to Southwark...

You can go down the waiting list as people who live closer to the school move in and push you further back. As Jollymummy's friends were offered their places ahead of my neighbour, logically they would have been above her on the list so must have moved in after January?


There's a great map that someone on here produced showing the catchments from last year for most primary schools round here. I would also have thought though that the new school openings/expansions will cause a bit of easing of some of the existing distances.

To clarify, my friends didn't move into the 'catchment' area after January, they were already there and applied before the January closing date. They were quite a bit down the waiting list when first round offers were made but moved up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...