Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Muldoon, what an idiotically offensive thing to say.


I agree with Huggers - this could be totally fabricated as part of a harrassment campaign by a controlling ex-partner; it wouldn't be that unusual sadly.


And even if it may be genuine, unless you have proof you could be exposing the forum to some kind of libel claim, so not a great idea to print details here.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll try again... The point I'm making is that we don't know if the details in the flyer are true

> and other explanations may be possible, so let's not judge. Is that any clearer?


No, not really, since you seemed to make a bit of an underhand judgement yourself. Aren't you doing the sort of finger pointing you are telling others not to do?


Anyway, I don't see an issue with posting the flyer if the personal details (names, addresses, photo) are redacted. Admin's opinion may differ, though.

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no, the husband of the woman who was doing the

> shagging!



There is no implication that the woman doing the shagging aka the Homewrecker has a husband.

I am very tempted to post the letter but it probably isn't a good idea . . .

A regular forum poster has pm'd me to advise they think the church mentioned is St Barnabus . . .

Dougal Mulldoon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I love the insinuation that its the woman's

> fault

> > for 'breaking up the home'. Nothing to do with

> a

> > married man cheating on his wife then?

> >

> > *rolls eyes*

>

> Numbers, do you always have to take the

> lesbian/feminist view of everything????


http://images.contentreserve.com/ImageType-100/0211-1/%7BBEDF97A9-BFB7-4B05-94DD-E45D1AB73DEA%7DImg100.jpg


have you had your tea, Dougal?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did!
    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...