Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Muldoon, what an idiotically offensive thing to say.


I agree with Huggers - this could be totally fabricated as part of a harrassment campaign by a controlling ex-partner; it wouldn't be that unusual sadly.


And even if it may be genuine, unless you have proof you could be exposing the forum to some kind of libel claim, so not a great idea to print details here.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll try again... The point I'm making is that we don't know if the details in the flyer are true

> and other explanations may be possible, so let's not judge. Is that any clearer?


No, not really, since you seemed to make a bit of an underhand judgement yourself. Aren't you doing the sort of finger pointing you are telling others not to do?


Anyway, I don't see an issue with posting the flyer if the personal details (names, addresses, photo) are redacted. Admin's opinion may differ, though.

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no, the husband of the woman who was doing the

> shagging!



There is no implication that the woman doing the shagging aka the Homewrecker has a husband.

I am very tempted to post the letter but it probably isn't a good idea . . .

A regular forum poster has pm'd me to advise they think the church mentioned is St Barnabus . . .

Dougal Mulldoon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> numbers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I love the insinuation that its the woman's

> fault

> > for 'breaking up the home'. Nothing to do with

> a

> > married man cheating on his wife then?

> >

> > *rolls eyes*

>

> Numbers, do you always have to take the

> lesbian/feminist view of everything????


http://images.contentreserve.com/ImageType-100/0211-1/%7BBEDF97A9-BFB7-4B05-94DD-E45D1AB73DEA%7DImg100.jpg


have you had your tea, Dougal?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...