Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This happened to me last year (at tge end of last summer) & I reported it. A young black male dressed in black with a black high topped baseball cap & sitting on a black bicycle (with no markings on it) knocked on the door very loudly & persistently. I eventually answered the door to find him banging his bike against my side gate, whilst trying his best to get in. He said he was looking for his friend Anthony & said it must be the wrong house. He then sped off.

It was pretty obvious what his game plan was!

Yes those young black male hoodlum hoodies do tend to get on their bikes and search for an easy opportunity, whether it be an empty house or a vulnerable person (but usually do it in gangs, as they are basically cowards) - don't give them any chances! I had my mobile phone snatched by one of them on a bike a couple of years ago in broad daylight ago and now i don't speak on my phone in public if i can help it.

ClareC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wottajoke Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On the other hand the guy could have knocked at

> > the wrong house.

>

>

> Pigs could fly.....


Why? The guy was walking away from house as they opened the door . Maybe it was just the wrong door .

Chips56 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ClareC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wottajoke Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > On the other hand the guy could have knocked

> at

> > > the wrong house.

> >

> >

> > Pigs could fly.....

>

> Why? The guy was walking away from house as they

> opened the door . Maybe it was just the wrong door

> .


Course it's not the wrong door. He was a "young black male".

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> northlondoner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Course it's not the wrong door. He was a "young

> black male".

>

> You can never quite tell tone of voice from the

> written word, can you? Sarcasm or racism? Hmmmm.


xxxxxx


Sarcasm in this case, surely? That was how I read it, anyway.

Prunella_Gatsby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes those young black male hoodlum hoodies do tend

> to get on their bikes and search for an easy

> opportunity, whether it be an empty house or a

> vulnerable person (but usually do it in gangs, as

> they are basically cowards) - don't give them any

> chances! I had my mobile phone snatched by one of

> them on a bike a couple of years ago in broad

> daylight ago and now i don't speak on my phone in

> public if i can help it.



This is one of the most ridiculous things i have read in a while. 'One of them'. Pffft.

Lumping all black, teenage, hoody wearers together is definitely a backwards step towards encouraging unity in the community. Pure xenophobia.


EDIT: .... And stereotyping

It has to be said, that reading some of these comments and some of the threads on this forum don't show East Dulwich in a very good light. Whether it's people venting outrage at scruffy doorsteps and a whole bunch of other inane stuff, to displays of outright rudeness and the outrageous comment by PrunellaG on this thread. I'm dismayed that there seems to be no logical moderation by the admin.

"it doesn't say anything positive about this forum, or the Administrator of it, if that post remains"


Really? rock and a hard place innit. Comment gets removed and admin is accused of censorship.

The forum is made up of all it's contributors, they do not necessarily reflect the views etc.


In this case an iffy comment has earned rebuke by the community, and I would rather the forum was by and large self-policed than heavy handed moderation.


A quick look at posting history of prunella revelas her to be (at least ostensibly) a self-confessed little old lady who has posted rather obsessively about crime since experinecing her own 'a couple of years ago'.


I'd probably try to enlighten rather than suppress, no?

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree mickey.....it doesn't say anything

> positive about this forum, or the Administrator of

> it, if that post remains. I've hit the report

> button. We'll see if that prompts any action.


Snap, I too have hit the report button.

I also find it offensive, narrow minded and racist.

I can't help thinking poor bloke did make a genuine mistake, after all he WAS cycling away when the poster got to the front door..not trying to break in.

Often at night its hard to see door numbers from the street and mistakes can be made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...