Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good Education


- Academic achievement to good level in a selection of varied subjects

- Ability to communicate in at least 1 other language

- Understanding of group dynamics and what social structure and dynamics exist ouside of the school environment

- Support to develop physically and mentally in at least one sport and support in participating competitively

- Support in developing in at least one artistic/musical pursuit

- Realistic introduction to various career options


Bad Education


- Thinking it?s all about learning from text books and ticking boxes.

I like your list, Brendan.


- Understanding of group dynamics and what social structure and dynamics exist ouside of the school environment


I left off the social-development type stuff from my list, because I got tangled up between civic understanding (understanding of rights/responsibilities and how the system works) and moral/ethical education, which is a bit trickier. How do you differentiate between what you should learn at home and what at school?


I also wondered about teaching children how to cook, is that essential?

Hmm I don?t know. It is tricky. I recon some things are not essential but pretty dam useful.


We got taught how to do things like change the oil in a car and hang a door. I don?t think these were essential but they have certainly come in handy.


Although knowing how to feed yourself is probably a bit more useful.

So what about learning about how our society works and how we can challenge the powerful?


Or how to live a life that could be sustainable, how to grow food, how to build your own house, how to make alcohol to run your car - useful stuff like that?


What is education?


Is it the preparation of a child to tackle the future as an adult?


Or is it teaching us to behave, be quiet, be small, be obedient and play our little role as a cog in someone elses machine?

It's a bit patronising to your average punter to say that their time in school was a brainwashing and that's why they're in the rat race. Compare today's rat race with a literate and largely skilled population to any time prior to the 20th century and I know when I'd rather live.

To be honest, if government is going to pay for education you can't expect them to teach you how to bring a government down; well, not unless you're teaching our youths in the army how to bring someone else's government down.


I'm afraid for 60 million of us to survive on this island we're going to have to play a something of a cog no matter what your politics are, ain't enough wealth, land or food to go round love. Fine if you finally get your AK, but personally I'll take my chances with, you know, a job and stuff.

You may wish you had taken the AK in a few years, Dear.


Or at least a few how to build your own house and scavenge for food classes.


Not being a pessimist or anything, but the end of capitalism is nigh - bring on anarchy (we know it will really be a military dictatorship - but we can all dream).



*Edited for grammar, punctuation and syntax irritations

Am I being incorrect in pointing out that people seem to say try and when what they should be saying is try to?


As in, ?We are going to try and get to the station on time.?


Surely trying implies an attempt not a certainty.


So if you aren?t certain of the outcome you are going to ??try to get to the station on time.?


If you are certain of the outcome you are just, ?...going to get to the station on time.?

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or how to live a life that could be sustainable,

> how to grow food, how to build your own house, how

> to make alcohol to run your car - useful stuff

> like that?


I'm interested now. Perhaps you could explain the scenario you have in mind, whereby we'd all be forced to resort to primitive survival skills? Are you thinking about the collapse of the economy? World-wide war? Revolution?

The ideas behind my suggestions were more about building character, competence and respect for self and others. Not about building little people to fit into the socio political environment we deem appropriate at the moment.


Ideologies, conformist or non, be dammed! They have no place in education.


If children are given a good strong character and robust abilities they will be able to build a world that works for them.

"I'm interested now. Perhaps you could explain the scenario you have in mind, whereby we'd all be forced to resort to primitive survival skills? Are you thinking about the collapse of the economy? World-wide war? Revolution?"


In fairness I was in Guatemala recently and got to see first hand what drastic climate change can do to a large and healthy civilisation comprising thousands of cities, the largest of which had populations in the many hundreds of thousands, intensive farming and a service oriented population, far more populous, vibrant and sophisticated than England in the 10th century I can tell you.


Then the rainfall in the region lowered drastically and permanently (historical rather than geological permanence, ie still a quarter of pre mayan collapse levels) and the sub Yucutan Mayan world collapsed into famine, pestilence, plague and death in a staggeringly short space of time, the jungle soon reclaiming millions of Acres.


The Black death killed 1 in 4 Europeans 300 years later and it took almost 2 centuries for France to have nearly as much farmland as it did pre-plague.


Don't think it can't happen to us, nemesis always follows hubris. As the Chinese say, may you live in interesting times!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...