Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nature lovers - duck lovers - what the blinking flip are those two lover-ducks in the Peckham Rye Park Pond? Unlike all the other ducks, they're brown, in different shades of brown, and they looked very loving, and there were only the two of them, being very sweet and pecking one another's beaks / bills in a sort of "if we had proper lips and not these daft bills we could get down to some proper kissing" sort of a way!


And can you hear that "Hnnnnnnnnnnnhhhhhhh" sort of a noise as you wander through? No, NOT the dogs trying to squeeze out a smelly one, but the sound of all the buds on the trees and especially the flower buds on the branches around the English Garden hurrying to squeeze out their flowery selves to us all!

It looks like you've got it bad, but don't worry, it'll soon pass.


At a guess, they might be little grebes which are small, as the name implies and brown, as it doesn't. They make a noise like a horse down a well, and that tallies with your description, even though they're not plants. Plants, even flowery ones, tend not to make noises if they can help it, as they're unable to run away from rampant herbivores and, at least until they've developed veils of leaves to hide behind, keep quiet. There are exceptions to this rule, of course, and the whistling bramble continues to baffle plant psychologists but, on the whole, the silence of plants can be taken as a given.

Thank you so much. The ducks were silent, it was the plants who were only making a noise in my mind.

But the ducks were not small, they were the same size as all the other ducks.


I recall a TV series called Tales of the Unexpected, where someone had developed the ability much to her horror of being able to hear plants and trees, especially when they were in danger or being cut down. I can't recall what happened in the end as I never stopped crying at the idea.


I love how this thread has (to date/time) been seen by 235 views but you're the first to actually reply. Thank you kindly. Enjoy Springing!

You're more than welcome. But I can't help with the ducks. Unless they had tufts and blue noses, in which case they're, slightly disappointingly, called Tufted Ducks, of which the females and young are brown. But they're probably not, Tufted Ducks being renowned for their inveterate and irritating tootling.


Oddly enough, those researches continued, and plant neurobiology is, near enough, an actual science (plant psychology, like the whistling bramble, remains a bit made up, I'm afraid). However, plants being what they are, it got complicated and not very telly-friendly and, as nobody's yet worked out how to make money from it, it doesn't get umuch funding. In either case, you can dry your tears now, as the experiments rarely get more aggressive than the occasional attempt to replace pesticides with inspirational music. Whether that's intended to inspire the plants or annoy the bugs remains unclear.

I'm enjoying this thread, much more than the property porn or planning arguments. I love the Sexby Garden, didn't know it was previously called the Olde English Garden.


For an unexpected treat, I can recommend the canal path behind Peckham Library in about five weeks' time. Reminds me of the country lanes where I grew up.

Can't help with the ducks but I loved the TV series - Tales of the Unexpected...can you hum the theme tune:)



PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you so much. The ducks were silent, it was

> the plants who were only making a noise in my

> mind.

> But the ducks were not small, they were the same

> size as all the other ducks.

>

> I recall a TV series called Tales of the

> Unexpected, where someone had developed the

> ability much to her horror of being able to hear

> plants and trees, especially when they were in

> danger or being cut down. I can't recall what

> happened in the end as I never stopped crying at

> the idea.

>

> I love how this thread has (to date/time) been

> seen by 235 views but you're the first to actually

> reply. Thank you kindly. Enjoy Springing!

Wisteria tends to err on the flat side imho, a fully fledged Laburnum is what you need for the high notes (crystal clear with no tinny top-notes). I had a begonia that was always sighing - eventually I had to give it away. It was just too much to handle.


Edited to put the 'o' in 'no'. And to reflect aftersmelling hearing the roses.

Living three floors up with a wisteria in a very very large pot on the back balcony, I can still hear the ducks and Canada Geese in the park opposite, but the wisteria's own Hnnnnnnnnnnnnhhhhhhhhh is drowning them out at the moment. Meanwhile, having bought far too many packets of bee friendly seeds which are heaving themselves into leaves but with no space to plant anymore, if anyone would like a tray of 15 or so PM me. I won't put this on the FS section, I'll just let you find it and PM me. They're noisy, mind. They're drowning out The Kick Inside.

We saw these lovely ducks in the park last week, and following some research thought that they might be Egyptian Geese. Link with photos here: http://www.gobirding.eu/Photos/EgyptianGoose.php


They appear to pair for life, which might explain the the fact that there seems to be only two of them in the park: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_Goose


Hard to believe they're classified as pests!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...