Jump to content

Recommended Posts

what I mean is that a lot of religious people believe that the bible is fact, based on actual things that happened. In reality it is a work of fiction tjat requires 'faith' to believe in a higher being. One could argue that Astrology is a higher power over which we have no control. I'm not sure any one has tried to pass it off as a 'science'.

Yes, I think some people do think that. And in fact, some of the things in the Bible are fact - e.g. Jesus was a historical figure, and stuff like that. A lot of it is more like opinion, isn't it?


I do think that astrologists think their thing is provable and scientific but I'm no expert. I don't think you can compare it with a religion, because it doesn't ask its followers to live in any particular way, which as far as I'm aware all religions do.


edited to say I think we're in synch now!

Leo:

Dignified, proud, regal, commanding, powerful, magnanimous, generous, strong-willed and reliable.

Cheerful and fond of games.


Physical characteristics: Stong well-formed back, red lips, Straight nose which is short with up-tilted nostrils, dignified poise, quick walk.



Well?

Yes, but some people because of their genetic makeup would never have red lips, except with the use of Red Sinner by Poppy King - which is fabulous, by the way. Anyway, it's a tedious, nit-picking and pedantic point so I'm going to drop it.


What are horses like, then? Or what's your occidental sign?


-and yes, I did mean the red lips.

Difficult to say as I think you have to be fairly objective.

As none of you know me it's a pointless exercise describing my characteristics but they are: deep feelings, passionate, extremes of behaviour, steadfast, determined.

Physical: deep-set eyes, steady gaze


My book doesn't say as much about us as, say, Leos. Harumph.


What is your sign and I'll have a look.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...