Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Helpful late night reply to the original post....


There was previously an unsuccessful planning application to turn it into a nursery on the ground floor. That was turned down at the time. Maybe there has been an update to that. Maybe post on James Barber's thread.

From what I can make out from quickly perusing the planning app site, they want the ground floor to be retail (already approved), a shed loads of 'studio flats' above and then to construct a further level with a couple more 2 and 1 bed flats.

It's a lovely looking building (though run down) and grade II listed. I really hope that the council take this into account before approving too many changes to the front.

The planning application summary does say "Listed building: Grade II".


OTOH, it doesn't show up as a listed building on the interactive map at http://maps.southwark.gov.uk/connect/southwark.jsp (category is 18th from end of side menu) , or in http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/search?pc=SE22.


Somewhere there should be an authoritative list.

Cold and unloved but yes, good lines. Like something from an abandoned 1930s Aerodrome.


This is how the discussion was going a year ago when the nursery lost out to some kind of retail unit - or so it seemed then...


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1005625,page=1

Hard to see what retail would do well on that site, no real footfall and it is isolated from the rest of the shops on LL. Another "Express" style supermarket I suppose as there is space for parking out front...but even the much fabled M&S would want a more high st site you would have thought?


Shame re: the nursery. Can see that being perfect location for that and let's face it, plenty of demand in the area.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...