Jump to content

Recommended Posts

High court upholds Camden busking restrictions

Judge says policy introducing fines of up to ?1,000 for busking without a licence is 'necessary and proportionate'


New licensing restrictions on buskers in Camden have been declared lawful by the high court.


Comedians Mark Thomas and Bill Bailey and musician Billy Bragg are among celebrities who took to the streets to protest over the restrictions being introduced by the council in the north London borough after noise complaints by local residents.


Busking without a licence is to become a criminal offence in Camden, punishable with fines of up to ?1,000.


Bragg, who spent his early career busking around London, said licensing would hurt a fundamental aspect of UK culture.


http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/mar/11/high-court-upholds-camden-busking-restrictions


Busking has been around since 1860 ish


New laws impose restrictions on certain instruments. The Melodeon (Used by Morris Dancers)

is to be classed as a 'Wind' instrument and faces strict restrictions.


Having been a Street Performer myself I understand there needs to be some restrictions on certain areas.

IE Covent Garden, New Bond Street, St Christopher's Place , all regular spots of Blackheath Morris Men

when I danced with them.


But a general clamp down on Buskers and possibly other Street Performers is just not on.


Buskers are an essential part of London. They attract tourists. They cheer people up.


Anyone have any views on the subject.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43058-buskers-and-street-performers/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a huge part of the problem.   Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country.    There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.
    • I heard today there was a burglary in Lacon Road yesterday evening between 20.00 - 22.00,  apparently the owners were home at the time & thieves got away with electrical items along with the owners car!  Wtf!   Anyone heard anything else?
    • What standing on the world stage? Starmer is a wannebe leader, no charisma, no passion, no leadership but tonnes of dithering, wringing his hands and pooing his pants.  I'd love to see Burnham give him a run for his money. Reason he became Mayor of Manchester was due to him no longer wanting to be in front line politics.  This thread has now gone well off topic, perhaps it needs renaming. Mandy and Keith's bathrobe Or, how Mandy stuck it to Starmer
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...