Jump to content

Recommendation for Matt (EDF profile: extrapairofhands)


dgastra

Recommended Posts

There have already been other recommendations for Matt (extrapairofhands) but I would just like to reinforce these.


Matt has now completed more than one job for us (handyman work that involves a bit of strength and organisation). He has been 100% reliable, arrives on time, works efficiently, isn?t greedy and is extremely amiable ? what more could you ask for?


I?m pretty sure that he could turn his hand to all kinds of jobs and I will definitely be using him again.


I couldn?t recommend him highly enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi dgastra - do you have contact details for matt? I need a couple of shelves put up and some signs on my kitchen wall. I hoped to get in contact with him for a quote etc. Can you share? I looked on the EDF but haven't been able to find them. Thanks, Cakey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello - Matt got in contact with me through a PM. He came round to our house today and did a great job putting up our shelves and pictures (actually old enamel signs). I highly recommend him for as a handyman - he arrived on time, was really friendly, competitively priced and efficient. His contact number is 07932639963. I will definitely use him again as he does things like painting, gardening and other odd jobs - I have already referred him to my sister! Cakey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Rockets : No one has changed the definition of 'consultation' or 'referendum', or switched the terms. They are different things and have different meanings. You can even check this in a dictionary if you're not sure about it. Regarding the most recent consultation (at least the one I assume you're referring to), it was about the design of the Square. It was not a consultation on the existence of the LTN itself, despite (again rather desperately and a little embarrassingly) some people pretending it was.  As for One Dulwich, I think what vexes people has been very clearly articulated, and very conspicuously ducked by those posting their regular missives: Firstly, they're claiming that people are accidentally driving through the square because of bad signage / lack of clarity. This is both ridiculous and ironic. Ridiculous because no sensible person could possibly believe it to be true, and ironic because they've objected to any updates to the layout (instead trying to pretend it's a rerun of the LTN consultation itself which closed several years ago as noted above). Secondly, they've claimed that someone has been pressurising the emergency services, yet fail to say who, or how. You seem to have suggested it may be the involvement of the 'far left' 😄 Anyway, It's all very tedious. If you want to improve signage, engage in that conversation, instead of trying to reopen debates that have finished. If you're going to claim intimidation of the emergency services, you probably want to give details and have some evidence. And if you think someone can drive through the square by mistake, you may want to question what you consider to be safe and competent driving. 🤣    
    • Got mine two days ago plus yesterday I received a second-class letter which was posted the day before in Sydenham
    • Back, regrettably, to the Private Eye benchmark test.  Have folk expecting the issue that would normally have been delivered on Wednesday the 24th received theirs yet, and if so, when?
    • What area are you in?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...