Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

We traded up and completely fluked the timing of it (feb last year)

i had a flat and my partner didn't own a property

we used the equity in my flat to buy a 3 bed and effectively 'geared up' (sorry) using the second mortgage belonging to my partner

so in the resulting rise we should have benefitted more than if we had stayed put


i'm firmly in the 'double-dip camp' though but we chose to gear up for baby reasons


death,dole,divorce


edit to say - is it me or does that cat look very alive? ;)

I'm mystified. I bought my flat in East D 4 years ago and have just had it valued by 3 different estate agents, all of whom valued it above what I bought it for, which surprised me as I assumed it would have gone down or at the very best retained the value I paid. The highest valuation was 90 grand above what I paid 4 years ago - are they simply making it up to encourage me to put it on the market?
  • 1 year later...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> or, to put it simply, Buy to let is @#$%&, as is

> "this is my pension" (aimed at your house). Marky

> I reckon your right a 50%ish fall and a long slow

> recovery


50% you say. It looks to me like ED property is currently trading around 2007 levels. Dulwich Village is ahead of 2007 levels it seems.


Buy to Let is back in fashion.


Discuss.....


(Love this thread, had to bring it back)

Yes the top of the market has rebounded strongly - much more so in central London, where prices are more than 10% over 2007's peak (provided you ignore the fall in sterling).


I think it's all propped up by the record low bank rate. This supports house prices in various ways:

* holds back tide of repossessions

* improves affordability for buyers (particularly the equity rich, i.e. wealthy buyers at top of market)

* makes savings accounts useless & drives yield-hungry investors elsewhere

* makes inflation more likely and increases demand for assets like property & commodities (QE also had this effect)



All this could go into reverse if rates start to rise, but I think the BoE will hold them low for years as it's now targetting house prices in order to prop up our quango-banks, which would implode if house prices crashed again. It certainly isn't a free market.


Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 50% you say. It looks to me like ED property is

> currently trading around 2007 levels. Dulwich

> Village is ahead of 2007 levels it seems.

>

> Buy to Let is back in fashion.

>

> Discuss.....

>

> (Love this thread, had to bring it back)

Another factor might be the wealthy Chinese buyers flooding into central London and buying almost everything in sight. Chinese investors made stacks in Beijing during the last Olympics and may be hoping for another Olympic bubble in London. That would obviously be a temporary boost for prices..



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 50% you say. It looks to me like ED property is

> currently trading around 2007 levels. Dulwich

> Village is ahead of 2007 levels it seems.

>

> Buy to Let is back in fashion.

>

> Discuss.....

  • 2 weeks later...

Agreed that BoE is targetting house prices or, more accurately, the continued (?) solvency of UK banks/PLc.

It certainly isn't bothered about inflation and probably prefers quite a high rate to erode Govt debt.

Borrow borrow borrow if you can...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...