Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huggers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gurkhas now have the right to settle in the UK

> after the high courts verdict last week. I

> believe.



No, they don't, unfortunately. The High Court allowed a Judicial Review of the decision not to allow some Gurkhas to settle. The government must now review the case of the individuals in question, but is still allowed to come to the same view, provided they come to the decision `properly.'


Still, the case generated publicity, and the government will be trying to work out if it can still justify not giving them passports. If Jonanna Lumley does what she plans, and gets her 1 million or 2 millon signatures to deliver to Downing Street, one would hope somebody will take note.

Thanks for the kind words, monday I collected 100 signatures. But on Tuesday I did read that this had been resolved? I will try and get some more info and if this is not, I will carry on collecting signatures. 1000 was going to be my target, but as a Gurkha,s/or widows pension works out about ?240 a year maybe I will try for 2400 signatures.

regards

jaytyger

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...