Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'd like to warn the people of East Dulwich that there is a bottom slapper on the loose. The perpetrator is around 14/15 and wears a rust coloured school uniform. Whilst walking along ED road this pm he approached me he said "nice bum" and then gave me a firm slap on my rump!


Once I got over my initial shock I realised I was actually quite chuffed and this made my day. Is this wrong?!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4371-goosed-by-goose-green/
Share on other sites

Depends if you have a secret desire for schoolboys or not (and I guess if you are his teacher or not as well) :-S


It is nice to see that you aren't upset by this act (even though it could be taken as 'sexual assult' by some people) and if it put a smile on your face afterwards then no it isn't wrong of you.

BJL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I must say that I'm really surprised by the

> lighthearted response to this incident. Let's

> hope he doesn't see this thread: he might get the

> idea that his actions are OK - or even welcomed by

> some women...



Beep, beep... here comes the offended bus.

Do we know jollybaby is a woman? And even if she is are we going to get offended on her behalf when she is fine with it?


I was happy enough when some young women did the same to me a few months back - it can be such a light-hearted cheeky thing to do. But by the same token if it happens to anybody and they don't appreciate it then they are within their rights to pull the person up - but for Gawd's sake let's not complain about someone who isn't upset

I was more wondering what time this 'ladies conker hunt' was going to occur.... sounds like a very fine thing to observe if you ask me... ;-)


Brendan - try APT Clothing on Rye Lane - but be warned that you may well look like the lead singer from AC/DC if you do get one from there.... :-$

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lead guitarist Luvpeckham, the lead guitarist from

> AD/DC.


That's what I said isn't it .... (note to self, being a bloke I am never wrong....unless I am and then I knew what I said was wrong but it wasn't what I was thinking which was right !!)B)

I guess that would also have depened on what JollyBaby's reaction to said 'ugly old man'slapping her bottom was as well, if she was still "Chuffed to bits" then I would hope exactly the same as the reaction here... however I expect it would be a completely different initial post however if it was done by an ugly old man !!!

I hate to get all serious about this but...


Sexual offenders are well known to progress from essentially 'innoncent' uninvited demonstrations of sexual intent to more threatening crimes over a period of decades.


Your humorous juvenile was demonstrating several disturbing traits: he took pleasure in breaking social taboos, he had reduced his target from an individual to a series of physical attributes, he became physical with someone outside his social circle, he subordinated his target to his own needs (he could have no idea you'd be entertained), he satisfied a thrill seeking urge by physically dominating a stranger, he felt that he could make this challenge without fear of retribution.


I should add that your failure to react will have reinforced his belief that these are acceptable traits, and increased the likelihood that he will commit more offensive crimes in the future.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...