Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Did anyone see a man running away from Bellenden Road, just near the junction with Choumert Road about 0945, today 14th May? I saw some pretty cowardly behaviour when a skateboarder _on the road_ had an upset and caused a lady on a scooter some pretty nasty damage. Had there been another vehicle around, it could have been much worse.


The guy in question was skateboarding fast down Bellenden, when he sort of "flipped" the skateboard which went flying under the wheels of the lady's scooter who was unlucky enough to be behind him. Fortunately she (the motorcyclist) wasn?t very seriously hurt, but was cut, bruised, and pretty shaken. Unfortunately, the bike however had been damaged, and when she suggested he was liable he said he would provide his name but he wouldn?t pay for the damage. When the motorcyclist got on the phone to the police he ran off. He was in his early 20s, white, reasonably well spoken, about 5?10, with a maroon sweatshirt, and a skateboard with fluorescent yellow top.


Having seen this, I chatted to the lady and heard all of the above, and it turns out that she probably can't claim because she's only got third party insurance. Pretty bad that someone should wind up hurt and out of pocket because of some ones reckless arrogant stupidity, and cowardly behaviour to run off, and not just man up and offer to pay what he could.


Anyway, be careful out there. :-/

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Pretty bad that someone should

> wind up hurt and out of pocket because of some

> ones reckless arrogant stupidity, and cowardly

> behaviour to run off, and not just man up and

> offer to pay what he could.


Indeed, and if you have their details, there's nothing to stop you suing them for the damage regardless of your insurance.

He shouldn't have been skateboarding on the road. That was an accident waiting to happen. Hopefully the description above is good enough that someone will know or recognise him. More and more road users are now attaching cameras to their vehicles and it's not hard to see why.
A skateboard is not a vehicle. It's completely stupid to use it on a road, especially when vehicles are using that road. Vehicles are required to have insurance. Some cyclists also have insurance (just in case they cause an accident). It's not ok to cause an accident and run off. If a driver does that, it's a criminal offence. He's liable at least for the damage to the scooter.

There is the following bylaw in Southwark....


Skateboarding etc


3. No person shall skate, slide or ride on rollers, skateboards or other self-propelled vehicles on any footway or carriageway in such a manner as to cause danger or give reasonable grounds for annoyance to other persons using the footway or carriageway.

Pokertime - you're right. How dare he ride on the road, he should know his place and it's not holding up upstanding tax-paying motor vehicles. And per your bylaw, he shouldnt have been on the pavement either. Ban skateboards. And bikes. And pedestrians. Then we can have more space for cares and motorbikes to get around safely.


(we can't understand the circumstances from one post, but it sounds like the scooter was too close to the "vehicle" in front and couldnt stop in time when he fell off. Had she been in front and a lorry behind, then I dont think we'd have the same reaction)

All we know for facts is the scooter was behind the skateboard, could have been in the middle of the lane and not directly behind preparing to overtake, anything really. We then know the skateboard "flipped", so could have gone directly backward, sideways, or at any angle between them. We also know the skateboarder wasn't in control of the board.


Not long ago there was a phase when I went past a lad every day, presumably on his way to school, on a unicycle. The situation described by the OP was one I dreaded every day and I sympathise with the scooter rider.

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is the following bylaw in Southwark....

>

> Skateboarding etc

>

> 3. No person shall skate, slide or ride on

> rollers, skateboards or other self-propelled

> vehicles on any footway or carriageway in such a

> manner as to cause danger or give reasonable

> grounds for annoyance to other persons using the

> footway or carriageway.



That doesn't say that you can't skate in the road though, it just basically says don't act like a moron. I won't comment on how he was skating because I didn't see it, but if he just came off his board accidently then that's no different to a cyclist coming off their bike.


He shouldn't have run off, but we don't know how he was being spoken to and he might have just gotten scared.


PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A skateboard has no brakes. It has only limited

> control. Yes it's pretty stupid for someone to

> skateboard down a road that motor vehicles and

> cyclists are using. That's all I'm trying to say.



A skateboard does have a brake of sorts, and a half decent skater can control their board more than well enough and stop very suddenly if need be.

These days I wouldn't dream of skating down a road, as it's been a looooooong time since I was a regular skater and I'd probably end up on my backside or worse. But when I was a teenager I'd happily skate in the roads (not busy roads like say Barry, and definitely not main roads) and don't believe I was a danger to any other road user because I could control my skateboard well.

Fair enough, but the police are really there for criminal matters, and I can't see anything up to the point when he ran away which could be construed as criminal.


It's an offence to not share your details after an accident, but to dispute liability or not to agree to pay unspecified damages at the roadside is not.


And as other posters have observed, the road user who goes into the back of the other is normally the one held liable.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why was she calling the police anyway?

> Had a crime been committed?


I'd guess becasue someone who had (in her view) caused an accident which was going to cause financial loss was saying they were just going to leave it and walk away and not pay, and she wanted help to resolve it. In addition the OP says she was cut, bruised, and pretty shaken so calling the police seems not unreasonable to me.


Once he did run off then the crime is potentially Failing to stop / report an accident although I'm not sure if it could be brought to bear against a skateboarder.

As far as giving personal details goes, I don't think he falls within s.168 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, as he's not a rider of a bicycle; nor within s.170, unless you can prove (I think you cannot) that he was the driver of a mechanically propelled vehicle. I think he may have caused, or have been behaving in a way likely to cause, a breach of the peace.
He would be classed as a pedestrian so if there were blame to be assigned it would be under those terms. The only course of action for the scooter owner would be through civil avenues I think, that is providing he would be worth suing. She needs a name and address to do that of course. The police would have been able to help in that respect if he hadn't run away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
    • Can’t imagine what it must be like you have your doorbell rung harshly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...