Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've had some fun with the canvassers tying to teach me the political landscape here.


"we're the republican party" - oh cool, which ones are the monarchists then?

"we're for a strong ireland" - really? I was hoping to vote for the party seeking to undermine it.


I'm none the wiser as far as differentiating the parties goes, but apparently having functioning sperm/womb and affiliation to the GAA are the sole requirements for local office, weirdly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748461
Share on other sites

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've had some fun with the canvassers tying to

> teach me the political landscape here.

>

> "we're the republican party" - oh cool, which ones

> are the monarchists then?

> "we're for a strong ireland" - really? I was

> hoping to vote for the party seeking to undermine

> it.

>

> I'm none the wiser as far as differentiating the

> parties goes, but apparently having functioning

> sperm/womb and affiliation to the GAA are the sole

> requirements for local office, weirdly.


These are the lads for you...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%ADs_Nua

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748503
Share on other sites

i do find it a bit weird the insistence that a party name has to be gaelic, given the inability of the vast majority to speak more than about three words.


If there was a cultural imposition that x in the UK had to be done in old saxon for political show, I'd find that probably a bit disturbing. Not sure why noone finds it so here*.


*mostly because they don't care for the most part, but then apathy in the face of political malaise is hardly unique to the republic!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748518
Share on other sites

Yes the voting is insecure- last time there were cases of people turning up at the polling station and giving their names and addresses and finding that people had already used their ballot papers! Dipping your finger in indelible ink is a good idea- and a sign that you have actually voted- which we all should do of course- even though most politicians are self-serving, vote-chasing imbeciles!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/44534-whos-voting/#findComment-748593
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...